|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
Maybe I need to elaborate more as you seem to feel I did not think my response through. We all know that Samba has their good reasons for doing this. Otherwise they would not be marketing it. I'm sure we can list several of these good reasons. But as we do so we also need to keep in mind that any soaring plane design is a concession to compromise. Let's quickly list some good reasons "why" for a 2 piece wing that I'm sure we can all more or less agree with: Pros: Less parts to mfg and inventory. Less labor to mfg. Weight distribution more "centered" to improve moment of inertia response in all axis. Easier to put a ballast box in that runs along the"tip to tip" axis to improve the planes moment of inertia response about the pitch axis when ballasted. Cons: Heavier overall for same "strength" More difficult to transport More fore and aft flexibility necessitates the spar being stronger (heavier) in this axis. Manufacturing scrap costs "can" be higher. (scrap a panel, loose 1/2 a wing) If we consider a 3 piece wing: Pros: Lighter overall weight for same strength Easier transport. More potential to market "improvement parts" later in the product's life. (can we say extended tips? or "Heavier/stronger center panel for high wind launching?) Cons More difficult to design with ballast box in wing. More parts to produce and inventory. More "work" involved in manufacturing. As a customer, I would prefer my concessions to compromise towards lighter overall for the same strength and easier to transport. I like also to know that if I damage a panel to the point of replacement, it should be less costly to buy a smaller panel then 1/2 the wing. I'm sure many will appreciate this new Samba product and it will no doubt be a fine plane. I really like the looks of it and I think the design points of the fuselage look very good. I just am not in the market for any 3.4+ meter plane with two piece wings. I will have to continue to be happy with my Pike Perfect. Thanks. Radian www.phflyers.com |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
|
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
It is apparent to me after toting F3B planes with TD planes that the MOST convenient beast would be one with a 2 panel wing and a full flying stab that requires no tools to assemble. I'm interested in trying a Perfection. R, Target |
|
|
Latest blog entry: Stork 4 Pro X-tail from...
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
Btw building technique is much like the precision F3B/F with stronger fuse and also wing/elevator/rudder is made with the new 40g spread tow. They are out flying as I write this. It is raining but they had to fly... ![]() Jojo www.jojoen.no www.f3j.com |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
Looks awesome... I love my perfect, I'm sure this is even better...
but I agree with Radian: It's out for me. Won't fit in wing bags, airline travel is impossible, etc. Heck, even my perfect is tough to get in my Subaru wagon because of the length of the fuse. I can't wait to see one here in the US. I got a chance to see one of the F3B versions and it was beautiful. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JoJo,
Please explain why you prefer this layout over the route chosen by Philip and Bemjamin??? The model loks like a a 2 piece wing Prestige , with Perfect sections... How do you see this as an improvement to Perfect, as you can already get a Perfect in this weight range? Will you fly it in Cyprus????? Good luck with the new toy. LJ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Latest blog entry: Stork 4 Pro X-tail from...
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Sold T-Rex 550FBL 3GX V2 "PERFECTION" (SOLD) | rapyd | Aircraft - Electric - Helis (FS/W) | 7 | Jul 25, 2011 06:44 AM |
| Wanted Pike, Pike Plus, Pike P or Pike WR Wing Center Section | Lancer263 | Aircraft - Sailplanes (FS/W) | 0 | Nov 11, 2010 11:07 PM |