
Feb 12, 2013, 03:32 PM  
Massachussets
Joined Nov 2005
236 Posts

Quote:


Feb 12, 2013, 11:37 PM  
Joined Jun 2012
811 Posts

So in conclusion, some of you have mentioned it is due to pitch increasing for P/D to stay the same, and some have mentioned it is due to chord increasing as the whole prop scales up. Either way it is because the formula assumes more than just D changes. Unfortunately, both of the points are valid but there is only room for one. So I did some thinking and I figured out  actually there is room for both due to another effect:
Just as the average speed of the prop decreases as D increases because the new section of prop moves at linearly higher speed  the average AOA of the prop is actually decreasing as the new section of prop has linearly decreasing AOA (due to twist). This is important  another application being that the whole reason aero forces increase by speed squared is that objects moving through air at higher speed move both more air, and move it faster. We are no longer moving it faster if we are reducing the AOA as we increase the speed. So, the effects of changing prop geometry and speed are: 1) Thrust from increased RPM, changes ∝ n^2 1) Thrust from Increased average speed due to diameter, changes ∝ D^2 2) Thrust from Increased length due to diameter, changes ∝ D 3) Thrust from Increased Chord, (not sure the symbol but calling it C) changes ∝ C. We assume this is proportional to diameter, therefore changes ∝ D. 4) Thrust from decreased average AOA, changes ∝ D^1 5) Thrust from increased pitch, changes ∝ P. So in total we get this: Thrust ∝ N^2*D^2*D*D*D^1*P = N^2*D^3*P The only way we get the conventionally used N^2*D^4 relationship is if we, as Martin Mckinney pointed out, assume that P/D ratio is constant and thus P∝D, so we get: Thrust ∝ N^2*D^3*D = N^2*D^4 Does this sound reasonable, everyone? I hope so because it makes me feel much better as this has been nagging at me for weeks if not months. @Jrb, I read everyone's posts in bed this morning on my mobile because I couldn't wait to read them, and thought about this response in my head at the time. At the time, with my stillasleep brain, I couldn't really comprehend your post, so I haven't had a chance to read, digest, and respond to you yet. It looks interesting though. Just give me some time :P 
Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Category  Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
How to calculate thrust, given RPM, prop pitch and prop diameter?  Hogster  Power Systems  8  Apr 13, 2014 08:53 PM  
Discussion  Go Pro Website Does Not Work With Windows 7  LNLP  FPV Talk  3  Jul 20, 2013 09:53 AM 
Discussion  Prop diameter, pitch and thrust (oh no, not this again.) Wait, please hear me out…  Ian Davidson  FPV Talk  63  Jun 27, 2010 07:39 AM 
Discussion  My THIRD (and now fourth) AP Attempt (with mixed resultssome improvement).  Fairmont  Aerial Photography  8  Jun 02, 2008 08:28 PM 
Discussion  Why no props with more pitch than diameter?  Bugman Jeff  Power Systems  10  Feb 06, 2008 10:50 AM 