|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Quote:
I think you are ahead of me now, so I'll be asking you stuff! Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
||||
|
|
|||
|
|
Quote:
good to see it again though, I will have to collect the on board video and see if I can combine it with youQuote:
seriously, here are some post maiden comments:-I took 3 attempts for take off, I did not seem to get to a good take off speed despite the short but wet grass. on the third attempt, I deployed the flaps and it did the trick, it took off with minimal fuss. -I got the shakes after take off because the aileron rates were low and it did seem very lazy on the ailerons, once I switched the aileron dual rate off, it flew much better but more was needed. -To my surprise, retracting or deploying the flaps did not modify the plane's behaviour, there was no change in pitch at all. -maybe I will try a bigger propeller on this, I used a 10x6 and although the power was sufficient, the climb rate could have been better. the plane flew well at 1/4 to 1/2 throttle. -the wings seemed to flap a bit but this is in part because I decided to replace the steel joiner rod with a carbon fiber one because it is a lot lighter. they did not cause any concern, after all this is not an aerobatic plane. -the Reaper seems like a fast plane -FVP wise, Frank was on the goggles complaining about loss of signal. I feel I will have to reposition the CL antenna at the bottom of the plane or make it poke through the dome, the position it is at now seems to be affected by the 2 lipos. -landing was executed with flaps on, after the successful take off demonstrated their effectiveness. it came down on a nice glidepath without dramas or tendencies to tip stall. -the landing gear seemed adequate for the plane, I was in fear of bending the nosewheel but it survived the landing and the take off abuse without problems. - the cons: well it is a delicate plane, one crash and it is goodnight Vienna ! there is not a lot of space in the cabin despite the bulbous nose. the plane is a bit of a porker, relatively heavy with double the weight/sqareinch if compared to a Cularis (of a similar wingspan).The wings profile is quite thin and the need for flaps proved they don't create much lift. Overall, I am very pleased, I was expecting a lot more aggro from it after reading the different forums about it. it proved to be stable, fast and gentle. I think I don't need to treat it with kid gloves and that it can be flown in a windier day. Having said this, it is by no means, a plane for the beginner flier. |
||
|
Latest blog entry: Airframes
|
|||
|
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Discussion FPV Car and Other Fun FPV Projects Thread: | Crash9 | Video Piloting (FPV/RPV) | 4419 | Today 06:54 AM |
| Discussion UK to France FPV | srjs | Video Piloting (FPV/RPV) | 61 | Sep 27, 2011 09:50 AM |
| For Sale FPV Stuffs UK | QUIKSILVER | Aircraft - General - Radio Equipment (FS/W) | 16 | Dec 24, 2010 09:16 AM |
| Discussion can we have a uk section in the for sales thread please? | kieran3008 | Trader Talk | 17 | Dec 15, 2009 08:22 AM |
| Discussion FPV WARS (Thread for FPV "B" Movies) | ch1 | Video Piloting (FPV/RPV) | 8 | Sep 16, 2009 05:37 PM |