|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
Wally |
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Joined Dec 2006
6 Posts
|
Quote:
I removed everything and connected 1 ESC to motor 1 connection. I checked ESC.. 5V was OK. Nothing happened unfortunately. I've attached a photo of the damage I've done with the Al screw. Could this have caused my problem? Are there any specific points/components I could check? Thanks. |
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Stillwater, Oklahoma
Joined May 2004
177 Posts
|
Quote:
I'll do that! My solution had been to build a harness (aka the current discussion) and use the (+) from BEC 1 to power the servo. I hope this helps somebody else! Cheer! SLCPilot |
|
|
||
|
|
|||||
|
Tokol, Hungary, EU
Joined Oct 2010
206 Posts
|
Hi guys, tested the board and I can tell it is really worth the 30 bucks !
The result of the maiden with P 60/70 and I 30/20 for roll/pitch and defaults for yaw here:
and the hover after some PI tuning here
Finally I understood that the default settings for roll/pitch P values may be okay but not for the I values. P=150, I=0 can work even for quads, mine are now 140 and 0 for all axis. What is NOT working at all is autolevel, I had to switch it off completely after a few tests because it was dangerous for control of the quad. What a pity, that the board sells itself with this feature , many people buy this board jut because of that. Of course it is worth the money even without autolevel but it is a mislead for ALL those who want to pay only for this feature. HK should realize this and correct the description, the sell rate of this product would not be reduced even after providing the correct info...
|
||||
|
|||||
|
|
|||
|
Australia, QLD, Brisbane
Joined Nov 2011
949 Posts
|
Quote:
http://warthox.de Quote:
Autolevel works by using the accelerometer chip. That chip knows there is an acceleration force of 9.8m/sec acting on it all the time called gravity, from that it can work out which way is up provided that there are no other acceleration forces on it at the same time. else it doesn't know which force is gravity. So the autolevel has to wait until all the other forces have died down to the point that the gravity direction is really obvious. This takes time. So every time you accelerate you can confuse the controller as to which force is gravity. It's basically meant for hovering. |
||
|
|
|
|
United States, TX, San Antonio
Joined Feb 2007
12,756 Posts
|
A.
For everyone's reference it is in the Flight training section of the the Quadrocopter and Tricopter Info Mega Link Index Cheers, Jim |
|
|
|
|
||
|
United States, TX, San Antonio
Joined Feb 2007
12,756 Posts
|
E,
Is it just the photo, or is the left side of D1 burned and desoldered? The scraatch marks near the screw hole are just on the ground, so unless something exle shorted to that, it is not the source of your problem. That said, nylon screws are preferred for mounting FCBs... Cheers, Jim Quadrocopter and Tricopter Info Mega Link Index Quote:
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
Tokol, Hungary, EU
Joined Oct 2010
206 Posts
|
Ah, okay, let me correct myself then. It works that slow that it can not be used in a manner as other FCs like Naza. Because of the big lag it makes trouble while controlling the quad, and as found in many other posts, not only for me.
If you call this working, let it be. |
|
|
|
|
||
|
Joined Dec 2006
6 Posts
|
Quote:
![]() It might be possible that ground hit the right side of D1. From now on I'll be using nylon for sure. |
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
I'm a little bit confused by your answer. Autolevel shoud be what it says : autolevel, the ability to level autonomously. It should be an help for beginners pilot, if they have difficulties, to leave sticks at center and the quad level itself. In what I know the accelerometer, assuming it is a 3 axis one, should know the attitude of the quad, referred to earth reference (gravity). I assume it is then a matter of coding. The code should compare the quad attitude with gravity and command the quad to correct its attitude. There are several stabilization boards which can do that. Please have a look at my blog to see several usages I did with the UavDevBoard (more on autonomous flight than at stabilization, but it is great at this last feature too). The code which is being developed for quads on this board is auto leveling and is amazing on this feature, but it is still in alpha. Btw autolevel is working for me. You can see that here. I still did not try it in real dynamic flight, but I don't expect miracles. I don't expect it levels my quad in a millisecond. This probably is the main mistake, expecting a stabilization board do what the pilot can't do. Anyway KK boards are amazing, considering the price. Developing, coding and testing is really time demanding, have a look at prices for closed source devices. Ric |
|
|
||