|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
If its not safer then why was it added to the last software update? The high throttle is very dangerous. If the RVOSD decides not to take over the fail safe you have an aircraft with WOT screaming off your table. Ask me how I know. This is the whole reason Alex added low throttle fail safe setting in the last software update. If you want to use high throttle fail safe then do so. But dont try and convince us that's it's safer. Even a newbie would know better. |
|
|
||
|
|
|||
|
|
Yes
Quote:
Quote:
Now let's think about this for a second, how do you get to return to home? (my way) The throttle stick already has to be at 90 percent. So the motor, under my control, is already nearly wide open. When you go past 95 percent, the motor instantly drops down 6.5 amps. Now about you having unsecured planes that are plugged in and alarmed flying around in your work area, this is something that cant happen in my work area because I don't take a lackadaisical approach to safety in my shop. If a plane is about to be armed, guess what? It is secured so it cant move. That's probably one of the differences between you and I. See, my FPV plane sits, locked in a cradle with a sandbag in the base. It is in this cradle at all times, whether in my shop, or while being transported. It only comes out of the cradle to be put on the ground when I'm ready to fly. While in this cradle, the plane cant move at wide open throttle. And about your stupid comment about bumping the trim down to activate fail safe, this goes back to you not paying attention to the context in which we are discussing this feature. Again to clarify for you, I was talking about having the ability to activate return to home using the throttle while in flight. My comment about the low trim was being able to have to fail safe set close enough to zero throttle to activate in the air. To do this, you'd have to have the receiver trimmed just above RTH, and trim down to activate return to home. In this context, that would be dangerous. This is the low throttle danger I was speaking of. You're talking about just fail safe in general, which in that context, you would be correct. Fail safe only, would be much better suited to low throttle settings versus a high throttle settings. This is common sense and all RC flight. This is one of many reasons my plane is always in its cradle at all times. Again I do things in a very safe manner. Not only my FPV plane, but all my plans are treated with extreme caution at all times. This is one of the discernible differences between you and I, I never had a plane takeoff of my table, unlike you. Unless you understand exactly what I'm talking about, you really shouldn't comment. |
||
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
I just got back from testing the RTH failsafe on full throttle stick and it seems to work just fine. Its great having both Fly By Wire and RTH available at the same time without having to flick thru the in-flight menu or switch off the tranny.
But next time i'll test out the low throttle failsafe. This could be activated on a switch by using a throttle hold set below zero. Im really happy with RVOSD5 so far its doing everything I want it to. Heading Hold is really cool, Fly By Wire even better. Have to test these features to see what happens when flying inverted. |
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Discussion Maiden Reports | 12345 | Arizona Model Aviators | 466 | Apr 23, 2013 06:29 PM |
| Help! RVOSD thermal sensors | rcmonster99 | Video Piloting (FPV/RPV) | 16 | Jun 20, 2011 10:21 AM |
| Discussion Weekend weather reports | neck | Arizona Model Aviators | 13 | Jun 10, 2011 04:59 PM |
| Discussion where are the Joe Nall horror "reports? | guy hanson | Radios | 49 | May 18, 2011 12:06 PM |
| Discussion Finally Fixed the Country Reports | daboz | Dynamic Soaring | 5 | May 16, 2011 02:51 AM |