SMALL - espritmodel.com SMALL - Telemetry SMALL - Radio
View Poll Results: Which CAD program(s) do you use right now?
A9CAD (Free) 9 0.89%
Alibre Design 40 3.96%
Ashlar-Vellum (Argon, Cobalt) 9 0.89%
AutoCAD 2000 through 2009 161 15.94%
AutoCAD 2009 LT 24 2.38%
AutoCAD v.10 (DOS) 4 0.40%
AutoCAD v.12 (DOS & Windows) 9 0.89%
AutoCAD v.13 (Windows) 13 1.29%
AutoCAD v.14 (Windows) 50 4.95%
AutoDesk 3D Studio Max 5.0 12 1.19%
AutoDesk AutoSketch 9 7 0.69%
Autodesk Inventor 83 8.22%
Becker Cad 0 0%
Becker Cad Pro 0 0%
BobCAD 18 1.78%
CADKey / KeyCreator 9 0.89%
CADRA 1 0.10%
CadStd lite 8 0.79%
CadStd pro 2 0.20%
Caligary Truespace 1 0.10%
Catia 56 5.54%
CoCreate Modeling Personal Edition (Free) 7 0.69%
DesignCAD 2-D for DOS 3 0.30%
DesignCAD 2-D for Windows 8 0.79%
DesignCAD 3000 DesignCAD 3DMax v.17 13 1.29%
DesignCAD 3-D for DOS 1 0.10%
DesignCAD 97 for Windows 0 0%
devCAD 24 2.38%
DoubleCadXT (Free, emulates AutoCAD) 9 0.89%
Euclid 0 0%
FastCAD 3 0.30%
Flight Simulator Design Studio (FSDS) 0 0%
Generic CADD 4 0.40%
Modo 401 by Luxology 2 0.20%
MoI (Moment of Inspiration) 3D 4 0.40%
ProE 45 4.46%
progeCAD 9 0.89%
Qcad 18 1.78%
Rhino 3.0 22 2.18%
Rhino 4.0 103 10.20%
Sketchup (Free) 153 15.15%
Solid Edge 2D 7 0.69%
Solid Edge 20 1.98%
Solidworks 1997 through 2008 213 21.09%
Tsplines (Rhino plug-in) 8 0.79%
TurboCAD Deluxe 38 3.76%
TurboCAD Deluxe 10 12 1.19%
TurboCAD Designer 10 0.99%
Turbocad Designer V7 3 0.30%
TurboCAD Pro 31 3.07%
Turbocad Pro v. 14.2, with Mechanical pack 5 0.50%
Other 184 18.22%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 1010. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
Thread Tools
This thread is privately moderated by mcg, who may elect to delete unwanted replies.
Old Aug 24, 2014, 10:56 PM
Registered User
Joined Nov 2008
185 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim.Thompson View Post
Or should that read: "big bang for the NO $"?
Hell yeah!!! Nothing beats a free a program that WORKS. Especially a parametric 3d solid modeling program.

For those that have some experience using it, has a model or assembly ever blown up on you when making a revision? Blown up as in crash the entire program for what seems like no apparent reason; see below.

I want to say Solidworks is worth the money in a professional setting for reliability, BUT:

In the company we lost a ton of man hours on parts that would crash the program and that = $$$$ lost. Nothing was immune: complex parts, simple parts, as well as assemblies. Simple parts were just tossed and remodeled from the print, complex parts that had a very significant original modeling time were usually sent in for troubleshooting. 95% came back with “there's a bug somewhere in the tree and we can't find/fix/explain/etc what's going on because we don't know.” This occurred with the most mundane revisions such as changing a hole size or position, adding a hole, making changes to the complex exterior shape/surface. So 95% of the time we ended up remodeling even the complex stuff. All because a bug was inserted somewhere in there original model.


I haven't tried FreeCAD because I have access to Solidworks and ONE seat of NX that is configured pretty well, it's nearly always available because nobody has taken the time to learn. Company got it after a drrraaaaaawwwwwnnn out competition of between Solidworks and NX (over a year), I had high hopes for NX as I had the pleasure of using Unigraphics during an internship so I knew the benefits of NX, especially for a high tech manufacturer of ~1000 CNC machines per month, but as soon as heard about this I knew NX was never coming. Just too expensive and the competition/investigation centered around being able to make an assembly of the most complex machine with probably 700 parts before adding fastelaptops. Major problem though: engineers were furnished with PC's MAYBE a 3 or 4 steps higher than a bare bones Dell engineering workstation. Basically a middle of the road Quadro video card, and a 64 bit machine with 4 gigs of RAM. Didn't matter what program was used because with those PC's it would half the day to load even if all but the most important parts were loaded as lightweight. The NX box was bought for one purpose: create a solid model of an extremely complex cam from laser point clouds. The process and CNC programs existed to make the part but there was no part in electronic form, the process and CNC code was just tweaked until a functional part was made.

Worked elsewhere that made the most basic stuff and we had dual Xeon processors so we had 8 cores and a ton more memory. THAT'S how you equip your employees for the best chance of success and innovation.

Little humor: using Unigraphics during my internship I opened 7 or 8 instances of Unigraphics to show my prototypes during a design review. I had no clue that all the different facilities across the country checked out licenses from a single main server. My bosses/mentors didn't know until after the review. They laughed pretty hard over it and said I probably made some people go crazy because they couldn't run the program LOL.

Apologies for the long posts. Just trying to illustrate all the issues encountered with CAD on the corporate sector.

Got an old Dell d620 laptop that is about to lose its larger hard drive to a precision m6300. Of I hear/find more good stuff regarding FreeCAD I'll install it and play around before wiping that drive.
Iceberg86300 is online now Find More Posts by Iceberg86300
Reply With Quote
Sign up now
to remove ads between posts
Old Aug 24, 2014, 11:21 PM
Registered User
p901P901's Avatar
United States, CA, Lancaster
Joined Jan 2009
1,264 Posts
But how much do you need to spend for designing RC planes for a hobby. My last job I used Autocad 2000 and Solidworks but both of these programs cost thousands. Right now I am using Turbocad Deluxe 22 and cannot do lofting and many other operations that Solidworks can do. For quick prototypes I use DevFus but it cannot do some of the internal structure or fuselage shapes that I need. So I struggle making 3D parts with Turbocad and often go to AC3D or DesignCAD 3D MAX for this . I can DXF export objects into TurboCad if needed.
I did loose some programs with them crashing but the programs I use do have a recovery option. Another safety measure is that I often back up a copy in a portable drive.
p901P901 is offline Find More Posts by p901P901
Last edited by p901P901; Aug 24, 2014 at 11:29 PM.
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 25, 2014, 12:48 AM
Just call me crash for short
Quick61's Avatar
United States, OH, The Plains
Joined Jan 2011
1,693 Posts
For those using about any parametric solid modeler program, below is a video that may help you out.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Iceberg86300 View Post
For those that have some experience using it, has a model or assembly ever blown up on you when making a revision? Blown up as in crash the entire program for what seems like no apparent reason; see below.
I have seen this happen sometimes when the geometric solver develops an unsolvable error. This can come from constructing a brittle model, or to say, a model that is not resilient.

While the video uses Solidworks for the example and there are some operations that most other programs don't have, both commercial and FOSS, the basic principles laid out are good to follow no mater what your using or designing.

Introduction to the Resilient Modeling Strategy (20 min 59 sec)
Quick61 is offline Find More Posts by Quick61
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 27, 2014, 10:21 AM
Gaui X3, Nano CPX (two)
BladeScraper's Avatar
United States, MO, KC
Joined Jun 2011
3,349 Posts
AutoCAD 2014
BladeScraper is online now Find More Posts by BladeScraper
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 27, 2014, 01:39 PM
InJamNoOneCanHearYouScrea m
United States, NH, Nashua
Joined Jun 2009
15 Posts
CamBam 0.9.N
wadasczi is offline Find More Posts by wadasczi
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 27, 2014, 03:16 PM
yank and bank!!
Joined May 2013
2,198 Posts
Thanks for the replies folks.
failboat is offline Find More Posts by failboat
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 07, 2014, 04:08 PM
Registered User
United States, MI, Grand Ledge
Joined Jan 2013
133 Posts
I use DraftSight by Dessault Systemes. It is 2 D, Autocad file compatible, in Beta. Runs on my Linux and is free for the single user.
sdad is offline Find More Posts by sdad
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 07, 2014, 04:14 PM
Gaui X3, Nano CPX (two)
BladeScraper's Avatar
United States, MO, KC
Joined Jun 2011
3,349 Posts
now I am using Inventor since I'm getting into 3D printing quad frames
BladeScraper is online now Find More Posts by BladeScraper
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 07, 2014, 06:52 PM
Registered User
Joined Nov 2008
185 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by FliteMetal View Post
Absolutely wonderful response to the diversity of CAD being used by RC Groups subscribers.

Obviously the majority of the current users are working "alone". It would be good to ask who is working with someone else sharing data, if not the actual virtual drawing space but perhaps on a different layer...

Where am I headed with this? Well it has more to do with what you personally do with your CAD data. Do you own a CNC mill, CNC laser cutter, CNC multiple axis hot wire? If you do own one or more of these, which and what is the file format utilized to drive your data from virtual drawing to physical-hold-in-your-hand modeling component?
Totally missed this one. I have the luxury of being in the business of designing CNC, and we work in Solidworks so everything stays in the Solidworks format. As we make CNC, we have a crap load of CNC machines at our disposal. The biggest and coolest are reserved for “pro” work obviously, but there are usually 5-6 test bed machines of various sizes/configurations that can be used to make personal parts, but that practice has become discouraged, and practically impossible unless you're making a part that advances your professional knowledge or something to show off capabilities. Unless you're a manager LOL. Basically, if you're clocked out you can't do crap anymore, so whatever you're doing has to be worth the $$$ you're getting paid.

But if you're proactive like I was, and learned the ropes of machining, you usually get the direction to make simple parts for prototype machines that need to be in shipping in 1-2 days to make the trade show deadline. Manufacturing/engineering is sperate, so if you need an aluminum spacer plate it's much faster to make it your self, especially if the layout fits in one of the standard aluminum test cut blocks used for smaller machines. There are probably a 1000 3" x 5" x 1" blocks in the small verticals final assembly area at any one time depending on what's left in a crate. Being an engineer has its perks though, there are “cutting tool vending machines” all over the manufacturing side of the house, and if you've been set up correctly a swipe and a pin # can get you $500 cutting tools, but that doesn't happen often, personally I don't want that crap on me. I once had to stress test a machine that was basically a duplicate of a production model with a enclosure, that meant putting together a standard test cut tooling package of ~$3k. With the way tooling disappeared from the proto area I almost set up cameras!

Anyway, more to file formats. Being a manufacture we pretty much has our pick of CAM software as companies threw their programs at us, but Mastercam was standard. We just imported Solidworks files and went to work. As I was the head of the plasma cutter development (that ended up in house only) I had engineers jumping on me to make their parts, which were usually given to me in 3d Solidworks format. As plasma is 2d, I took our standard 3 axis mill post processor and modified it to take all z axis motion and spindle start and stop M codes and translate them into M codes programmed into the plasma for start and stop cutting.

We bought a couple garage CNC plasma cutters for research, and while usable, the part had to be drawn with the software on the computer running the machine. You could import vector drawings, but there was always a75% chance you would cut your part in half accidentally.

We work with a lot of casting houses, sheet metal companies, etc, and they all got Solidworks eDrawings, Solidworks prints, and the Solidworks part file. Print and part files were read only if they got them, and eDrawings were mainly used for design optimization as they could be marked up. Pretty much every commercial vendor we worked with had pro level software to run their machines, and I don't think any of them are missing the capability of importing a 3d Solidworks part. In the rare cases an iges or step file would be exported and sent. These are pure 3d files with zero design trees when imported.

My first task during my internship around ~03 after learning the basics of Unigraphics was to take imported featureless parts from what I assumed was Solidworks for a large machine whose design was farmed out was to take t those solids and create native Unigraphics drawings that matched the originals.

Let me give you a tip, if you or your company uses a consultant or design firm, make sure they use your native program, even if you need to buy them a seat or pay extra. We ended up with native drawings, but that's it. ALL design intent in the solid was lost, and there was no editing of features because they didn't exist. It was like getting a finished part in your hand. You can look at holes and complex pockets, but you can't change them. In this case if you wanted to edit it was best practice to project a sketch, fill in the feature, then start over. This way you at least have a fully defined feature that is easy to edit in the future.

Hope this helps some.

Steve
Iceberg86300 is online now Find More Posts by Iceberg86300
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Category Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Question What do you recommend as a good CAD program for model design Warthog_Fan CAD/CAM 31 Feb 24, 2011 10:31 AM
Discussion What lense do you use? (FOV?) Craig9080 FPV Talk 27 Feb 26, 2010 01:14 PM
Discussion List of every CAD program you have ever tried.... mcg CAD/CAM 37 Jan 22, 2010 05:01 PM
Discussion Who's bearing's do you use? shultz Mini Helis 10 Nov 06, 2009 02:21 PM
Haldor what CAD program do you use! thrmaln Electric Ducted Fan Jet Talk 53 Apr 27, 2003 09:27 AM