|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Having owned both, I think the decision should really depend on how well you land now.
I moved up to a full-sized PZ T-28 too early, before I was very confident at landing and before I could do so consistently. It resulted in my crashing beyond recovery two T-28s. I'm on my third and can now land on a dime and do all sorts of approaches in all sorts of wind and still land. I wouldn't base the purchase on what you can do in the air: we're all good in the air much faster than how good we are low and on landings. I recently flew my Super Cub again, and I was surprised at how responsive it was and how fun it still was to fly in the air. Landing it, with the ability I have now, was MUCH easier with the Cub: I could land it at almost any speed and stupid approach I could muster. The aileron training on the more stable Cub will help a lot to your getting used to the T-28. Even after you get your T-28, I would recommend you warm up with the Cub as your first flights for the day, to calm yourself down and to ingrain the basics of flying and especially landing, before you fly the T-28. Even the stock T-28 has a lot more power and can get away from you in the air much quicker. I have some suggestions for newbie pilots on how to land in my RC Groups blog, but your choice if you wanna read it or not. I like getting new planes like the next guy, but if I had to do it all over again and was going to get all the planes I was gonna get now anyway with the greedy eagerness that I have for shiny new planes, I would make the aileron mods to the Cub first then get the T-28. I like the Navy T-28 version, as it is much more visible in the sky. It does kinda look like a sissy on the ground though. |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
I have modded the SC wing twice. Nothing from that plane compares to the handling of the T28. So put the SC on the shelf and advance. |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
+1 to demuddy. It does depend on how well you land. When I got my T-28, I had already had my Super Cub for about a year and could land it perfectly. I haven't crashed my T-28 in the month I have had it (exept that one time it ran out of batteries
). The T-28 is exiting and fun to fly, but it is 5 times harder to land than the cub. Also, (if you still feel you are ready) I believe you should get the T-28 and not mod the cub because then you have two planes, and if something were to happen to one, you could still fly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hey, don't get me wrong, I recommend getting both too, eventually. Especially if money is an issue. If money, however, grows on trees for you, OP, the order in which you do this and lose some money at the front end should not be an issue. After all, I crashed and got a second Cub, and I'm on my third T-28.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Discussion FS: Super Cub, UM F4U, UM T-28, DX5e, and Celectra 4-port | WiperBlade | Atlanta Area RC | 1 | Apr 01, 2012 11:09 AM |
| Question First Plane - HZ Champ or HZ Mini Super Cub? | NVFlyAngler | Beginner Training Area (Aircraft-Electric) | 32 | Jul 31, 2011 10:56 PM |
| Help! HZ super mini cub or TG super cub? HELP!! | awesome_smiley | Beginner Training Area (Aircraft-Electric) | 10 | Dec 27, 2009 10:36 AM |
| Question Best Simulator for HZ Super Cub and PZ t-28??? | grtninja | Simulators | 5 | Aug 16, 2008 05:19 PM |
| Discussion Aerobird 3 or HZ Super Cub or HZ Slow-V | kiteral | Beginner Training Area (Aircraft-Electric) | 6 | May 26, 2007 01:27 PM |