HobbyKing.com New Products Flash Sale
Reply
Thread Tools
Old Jun 28, 2014, 07:50 PM
Registered User
Fond du Lac, WI
Joined Mar 2005
537 Posts
Discussion
To All Members: AMA Alert

AMA's Areas of Concern Regarding the FAA Interpretive Rule for Model Aircraft

On Tuesday, June 24th AMA issued a member alert expressing concern over some provisions in the FAA's interpretation of the Special Rule for Model Aircraft established by Congress in the FAA modernization and Reform Act of 2012. In that alert, we let members know that we would be following up with today's alert that explains AMA's concerns in greater detail.

We need you to take action now and respond by July 25, 2014 to the FAA Interpretation of the Special Rule for Model Aircraft that was released June 23, 2014. The Academy has reviewed the rule and is extremely disappointed and troubled be the approach the FAA has chosen to take in regards to this issue. FAA's Interpretive Rule

To help you respond to the FAA, we have outlined AMA's major concerns in the bullets below. A more in-depth explanation of our concerns can be found at AMA's Concerns

•Throughout the rule the FAA takes great latitude in determining Congress' intentions and in placing tightly worded restrictions through its "plain-language" interpretation of the text.
•The FAA uses the plain language doctrine to create a regulatory prohibition of the use of a specific type of technology.
•FAA's overreaching interpretation of the language in the Public Law is evident in the rule's interpretation of the requirement that model aircraft be "flown strictly for hobby or recreational use."
•Although the FAA acknowledges that manned aviation flights that are incidental to a business are not considered commercial under the regulations, the rule states that model aircraft flights flown incidental to a business are not hobby or recreation related.
•The rule overlooks the law's clear intention to encompass the supporting aeromodeling industry under the provision of the Special Rule, "aircraft being developed as a model aircraft." The rule's strict interpretation of hobby versus business puts in question the activities of the principals and employees of the billion dollar industry that supplies and supports the hobby.
• The Public Law states that when model aircraft are, "flown within 5 miles of an airport, the operator of the aircraft (must) provide(s) the airport operator and the airport air traffic control tower (when an air traffic facility is located at the airport) with prior notice of the operation. However the rule indicates that approval of the airport operator is required. Although it is understood that making notification to the airport and/or ATC will open a dialog as to whether the planned activity is safe to proceed, there is no intent in the law that this be a request for permission on the part of the model aircraft pilot.
•The Interpretive Rule establishes new restrictions and prohibitions to which model aircraft have never been subject. This is counter to the Public Law which reads, "The Federal Aviation Administration may not promulgate any rule or regulation regarding a model aircraft or an aircraft being developed as a model aircraft,..." if established criteria are met.
•The Interpretive Rule attempts to negate the entire Public Law by stating, "Other rules in part 91, or other parts of the regulations, may apply to model aircraft operations, depending on the particular circumstances of the operation. This in and of itself makes model aircraft enthusiasts accountable to the entire litany of regulations found in Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations, something that was never intended by Congress and until now never required by the FAA.
How to Respond to the FAA.

All AMA members, family and friends need to take action now to let the FAA know that this rule significantly impacts the entire aeromodeling community and that this community is resolute and committed to protecting the hobby.

There are four methods to submit a comment. Emailing your comment is the fastest and most convenient method. All comments must include the docket number FAA-2014-0396. Tips for submitting your comments.

Email: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for sending your comments electronically.

Mail: Send Comments to Docket Operations, M-30; US Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.

Hand Delivery: Take comments to Docket Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

Fax: (202) 493-2251.

DEADLINE TO COMMENT: On or before July 25, 2014
Bob J is offline Find More Posts by Bob J
Reply With Quote
Sign up now
to remove ads between posts
Old Jun 29, 2014, 12:16 AM
Heath
Appleton, Wisconsin
Joined Aug 2002
75 Posts
Impact on Sod Farm

From AMA:
http://www.modelaircraft.org/aboutama/question.aspx

Q. Now that the FAA reauthorization bill is signed into law, should we start contacting the airport/ATC when operating within five (5) miles of a public airport and should clubs begin establishing operating agreements for established flying sites in this region?

No, at least not yet.

There are still a lot of unanswered questions regarding how the MA provision in the Bill will be enacted and what oversight authority the FAA will continue to have on us. FAA is tasked by federal law with maintaining the safety of the NAS and we will need to come to an understanding as to how the AMA member will operate within the national airspace in the future. As such, it’s probably a little too soon to react to the Special Rule for Model Aircraft in what is now Public Law 112-95. AMA is working with the FAA in establishing the criteria for recognition as a community-based organization (CBO) and will be further working with the Unmanned Aircraft Systems Integration Office in formulating the procedures for complying with the safety criteria established in the special rule. Unfortunately, this process is taking longer than expected and it will likely be several more months before we’ve ironed out all the details.

For now, AMA suggests business as usual. AMA members and chartered clubs should continue to operate in accordance with the AMA Safety Code as you have in the past. If you already have an agreement with a neighboring airport then certainly continue to operate under the provisions of that agreement. However, if you currently fall within five (5) miles of a public airport and you don’t yet have an agreement, unless approached for some reason by the airport or ATC it’s recommended you hold off on pursuing an agreement until the AMA is able to provide a form and format for doing so.

As it stands, it’s unlikely there will be an impetus for an established agreement until the issues surrounding the proposed sUAS rule are resolved over the next 12 to 18 month; however, if you do get approached by the airport authority or someone from the FAA, please contact AMA for assistance.
Salin is online now Find More Posts by Salin
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Category Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Poll AMA Members Average Age Poll Liberty10 3D Flying 0 Dec 31, 2013 03:14 PM
Fly-In Sunday, June 24th - Bridgewater, MA - Free to all AMA Members BUFlash Electric Flight Events 3 Jun 21, 2007 12:22 PM
Yippee! AMA Members helping AMA members Hossfly AMA (Academy of Model Aeronautics) 0 Sep 02, 2005 10:06 PM