The next question is who told Ms. Rice to lie for the WH?

Now don't you go picking on that little rice girl. You got a problem with her, you take it straight to obama. He will handle it.


Sarcasm, obviously.

Originally Posted by Craig Downer

Now don't you go picking on that little rice girl. You got a problem with her, you take it straight to obama. He will handle it.


Sarcasm, obviously.

It appears that Mr. Obama's administration is convinced that America is totally like those who voted for him......those who will believe anything his administration says.

For me, it came from the fact that at the moment our consulate in Benghazi was being attacked, embassies around the world were seeing protests about the video. Shoot me.

Originally Posted by rcposter

For me, it came from the fact that at the moment our consulate in Benghazi was being attacked, embassies around the world were seeing protests about the video. Shoot me.

Really? I didn't see a single protest about the video. I never saw any signs that said anything about a video. The only people I ever heard mention the video were the Obama administration.

Originally Posted by rcposter

For me, it came from the fact that at the moment our consulate in Benghazi was being attacked, embassies around the world were seeing protests about the video. Shoot me.

That still doesn't erase the fact that for the specific case in Benghazi, the White House knew it wasn't about the video ... and they knew that before they went out and said it was about the video.

Originally Posted by RumRunner_1492

Really? I didn't see a single protest about the video. I never saw any signs that said anything about a video. The only people I ever heard mention the video were the Obama administration.

I have to tell you, that is literally unbelievable. The protests over the film at that very moment were well-documented as they happened.

http://www.aljazeera.com/news/asia/2...303333744.html

http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/201..._protests.html

Originally Posted by rcposter

I have to tell you, that is literally unbelievable. The protests over the film at that very moment were well-documented as they happened.

http://www.aljazeera.com/news/asia/2...303333744.html

http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/201..._protests.html

Just maybe you should find more reliable sources for your news.

Originally Posted by RumRunner_1492

Really? I didn't see a single protest about the video. I never saw any signs that said anything about a video. The only people I ever heard mention the video were the Obama administration.

Then your vision was very selective.

Originally Posted by LcJ

Rice's Video Theory Didn't Come from Petraus

You know this how?

Originally Posted by RumRunner_1492

Really? I didn't see a single protest about the video. I never saw any signs that said anything about a video. The only people I ever heard mention the video were the Obama administration.

yeah really, that's what people was told so that's the way it was.

News of a protest against the video outside the consulate was reported by Reuters, and picked up by many other news organizations because that's what happens in such situations.

The ambassador, Christopher Stevens, and the other Americans were killed after Islamist gunmen attacked the U.S. consulate and a safe house refuge in Benghazi on Tuesday night. The attackers were part of a mob blaming America for a film they said insulted the Prophet Mohammad.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/...88B0EI20120912

Originally Posted by rcposter

I have to tell you, that is literally unbelievable. The protests over the film at that very moment were well-documented as they happened.

http://www.aljazeera.com/news/asia/2...303333744.html

http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/201..._protests.html

I knew the protests were well documented but I hadn't seen anything on the ground which confirmed they were related to the video. Thanks for the links.

That does not change the fact that there was no protest at Bengazhi and the adminstration and Susan knew that. They knew this was not part of a spontaeous protest about a video as they claimed. They knew this was a coordinated terrorist attack but they decided they should make-up a story about it for some reason.

Originally Posted by thunder1

News of a protest against the video outside the consulate was reported by Reuters, and picked up by many other news organizations because that's what happens in such situations.



http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/...88B0EI20120912

That's odd. There was no mob. There was no protest.

Originally Posted by LcJ

Just maybe you should find more reliable sources for your news.

No, those sources are just fine.