Anyone using FatShark goggles and flying with a 900mhz vTX?

I was looking at HP but with all the issues of the lib and lack of CS I am having second thoughts. I have to fly 900mhz but I want the easiest set up, and fewiest wires possible with the best pict I can get. Any suggestions?

the fatsharks have 2.4ghz built in. if you go with 900mhz you have to have an external receiver so you dont gain a whole lot form fatsharks vs headplay. the image quality of the headplay is supposed to be better (never tried them), they are more adjustable for people with glasses but they have an external processor module. the fatsharks have a wider field of view but image is blurry along the edges and they seem a little more portable. but if i weren't using 2.4ghz i'd have been more interested in the headplay goggles.

ron

Thanks Ron, I went with the HP. Never could get an answer if FS was going to offer them with a 900mhz vRX built in and if I am going to be tethered to my GS I figured I would go with picture quality and more adjustability.

You went with the HP and what is your impression with them in the past two years? I would appreciate your response, for i wonder how better is HP in regard to colors and view.