|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Quote:
![]() The reason I was concerned that the R9's wouldn't work is that the users manual for the international market R9 lists that it has 1 PPM in port (for an RSAT connection) and no PPM out capability; according to the international users manual the only international receivers that offer PPM out are the RSAT2, R10, R14, or R18. A good deal of my confusion is caused by a lack of published detailed information and specs on the US market receivers. Right now I'm reading the users manuals for the international receivers to get detailed information and it's very apparent there are several differences between the US/Canadian market receivers and the International market receivers. I'm sure this will be cleared up as Jeti USA releases more information on the US-market receivers. Again, thanks for the additional info! Now I can sit back and wait without worry until my TX arrives next Tuesday. ![]() Quote:
standard output is for directly connecting servos to the receiver; each connector is a discrete output for a single channel. PPM output is a single cable "summed" output that combines and forwards the data from all RX channels to a single cable for output; this is used for feeding all the RX data to another unit such as a flybarless controller for helis using only a single cable. The FBL controller needs to know the positions of all channels; while this can be accomplished via individual patch cables for each channel from the receiver to the FBL controller if you use PPM mode the RX can send the FBL controller the information for all channels using only a single cable. This cleans up the wiring substantially and also eliminates failure points; with individual patch cables you have say 5 cables each with 3 conductors and a total of 30 connectors between the RX and the FBL controller, any of which if they fail could down the heli. With PPM you only need 1 cable with 3 conductors and 6 connectors linking the RX and FBL controller; that's far less wire and connector crimps that could fail. Jeti also uses PPM for a single cable link between receivers in a multi-receiver installation. This way two receivers can split the servo loads and also provide signal redundancy from the TX. You could say have one receiver up front in a large plane for the throttle and aileron servos linked via a single PPM cable to a second receiver in back that not only acts like a satellite receiver (for signal redundancy) but then you could plug all the elevator & rudder servos into that second receiver in the rear of the plane and avoid having to run long servo extension leads from the elevator & rudder servos up to the front receiver. |
||
|
|
|
|
New York
Joined Feb 2002
2,854 Posts
|
Thanks Kiba, I think I sorta get it...but the big take-away for me is to stick with sail and power planes and don't mess with them whirlly things! But seriously, in the large airplane example you mentioned, if the front RX failed, would the rear RX then drive the servos connected to the front RX?
Steve |
|
|
|
|
|
Based on the manuals, if only the RF portion of the front receiver failed, yes; the PPM link would keep providing signal from the rear receiver to the front receiver to drive the servos connected to the front receiver. If the entire front receiver failed (RF section and output section) then you would lose control of all the servos connected to the now-dead receiver.
You don't have to wire it this way... you can still connect all servos to a single receiver and connect a second receiver in another location in the fuselage via PPM link to the first receiver for signal redundancy in case of obstruction/signal fades/etc. In that case if the signal quality going to the front receiver is somehow degraded the second receiver can still provide control. From the manuals it looks like you can also "clone" receivers and run two or more separate receivers simultaneously to control one model without any connection between the receivers. |
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
Regards, PAT |
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Joined May 2010
765 Posts
|
Quote:
The US version of the profibox is also FCC certified. We disabled the RF module, no need to act as RF module for the radio, this configuration is obsolete. Zb/Esprit Model |
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Joined May 2010
765 Posts
|
Quote:
Zb/Esprit Model |
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
Regards, PAT. |
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
Any suggestions for another solution? Regards, PAT |
|
|
||
|
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| New Product Jeti 2.4GHZ system with telemetry, easy-to-use sensors, and audio alarm! | Julez | Radios | 1814 | Sep 11, 2012 04:43 AM |
| Discussion Jeti Duplex DC-16 Radio & Profi Wireless Downlink. Monitor/Record A/V/mAh/Speed real | Esprit Model | Radios | 16 | Jun 16, 2012 08:11 AM |
| Help! Can I run a 2.4GHz Radio and a 2.4GHz FPV system? | MaNDoWn | Video Piloting (FPV/RPV) | 7 | May 06, 2012 01:22 AM |
| Help! Jeti Duplex / updating firmware to EX | VinceHaworth | Radios | 1 | Feb 07, 2012 05:04 AM |
| Question Official Jeti DUPLEX 2.4 Range? | Jose E Bruzual | Hobby Lobby | 3 | Jun 01, 2009 11:58 AM |