| RCCars | Crack Roll | Flying Giants | RC Power | The E Zone | Lift Zone | Our Sponsors | |||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
#16 |
|
Strange Plane Central
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Poway (near San Diego), CA US
Posts: 1,843
|
Great thread!!
May I add that typically we advance time about 5 mm in the opposite direction of intended shaft rotation. The mabuchi 370, for whatever reason, comes pre timed for the rotation of a direct drive tractor prop. No need to time it in that use. The motor in a GWS gearbox comes, in effect, retarded timing!!! That is why it needs 10 mm endbell (backplate) rotation. Peter, your explaination is good or better than any I have seen. (that means I could understand it )
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
IAMCANADIAN
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gibsons, B.C. Canada
Posts: 3,705
|
Thank you. I'm gonna try that for sure. My 300C has almost 100 flights on it now (just short of 600 minutes) mostly on 7 cell NimHs. Seems fine but more effeciency is always music to my ears.
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Blissfully Ignorant
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Port Moody, BC, Canada
Posts: 235
|
One thing I have never understood, is why GWS keeps buying the Mabuchi motors with the brushes and timing set to run CCW when they are then going to put them into a gearbox and run them CW. Mabuchi motors are fairly generic, is there not a similar and equally affordable motor out there that has the brushes installed for the opposite rotation?
How hard would it be ro remove the end plate and pull out the brushes and re-seat them the right way? I know getting the spring tension would be really hard. |
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Darwin Australia
Posts: 6,345
|
Quote:
Ken |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Blissfully Ignorant
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Port Moody, BC, Canada
Posts: 235
|
Yup, I realised it as soon as I sent it, I keep forgetting that the order is think, then type...
Doh! Why doesn't GWS send motors built correctly for gearbox usage? |
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Iron Mountain,MI
Posts: 2,263
|
Re: question
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Darwin Australia
Posts: 6,345
|
Quote:
Ken Last edited by kensp; Mar 07, 2003 at 04:21 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Key West
Posts: 13,109
|
With some motors, it's possible to turn the end plate without undoing the tabs if you have a c or snap-ring pliars which gives a good grip on the plate.
hoppy |
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Who moved the runway?
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Australasia
Posts: 704
|
S300 in reverse
Hi guys,
I have been doing some thinking about the lifetime issue with EPS-300 (Speed 300) motors (and others which we run opposite to their intended direction) and have what is no doubt a silly question. Hope you will bear with me. Is it true that pusher props (for example http://www.hobby-lobby.com/grprop.htm#Pusher) are designed to spin in the opposite direction as normal (tractor) props when looking from the nose of the plane? If so could we take a pusher prop, flip it around and install it on an EPS-300 gearbox so that the side that normally faces the motor (on a pusher plane) is now facing away from the motor on the EPS-300 and then run the motor the opposite way (ie. the direction Mabuchi intended it to be run)? This would help with the problem of breaking brush wipes. Comments? What am I not seeing? Jeff |
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Professional idiot
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 2,141
|
Quote:
I think a better question would be why GWS don't design their gearboxes to take account of this. Most other manufacturers seem to have got this right. It seems strange to cripple yourself from the get go by producing a system that is down on power from it's potential. -- Dave |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Key West
Posts: 13,109
|
I like MPJet gear boxes, they spin in the right direction, and are a lot tougher than the GWS boxes.
hoppy |
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: W. Bloomfield, Mi
Posts: 505
|
split-ring pliers
Where can these be purchased?
michael |
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Iron Mountain,MI
Posts: 2,263
|
Re: split-ring pliers
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Concord, MA
Posts: 829
|
pusher props and gearboxes
Yeah, if you get a pusher prop and put it on a gearbox that reverses the rotation of a motor, with a non-reverse timed motor, you should end up with a set-up that runs the motor the right direction. You will discover that your choices for prop size are quite limited, however. You could also always turn the motor to face the other way, a la Wingo. If you don't have a tach, you should be able to figure the way a motor is timed by listening to it, then reversing the power leads. The direction it sounds faster in is the direction it is probably timed to turn in. I would not be surprised to find that some of the cheaper motors used for park fliers are actually neutral timed, in which case they will be slightly more efficient if you change the timing for forward or reverse operation. But if you really are interested in efficiency and are willing to put that kind of effort into it, I have to ask why you just don't go out and buy a brushless motor and ESC????
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Stupid Gravity
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: alsip, ill
Posts: 499
|
Thanks!
This thread is perfect! I can not wait to try this modification!
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Timing GWS 300C motor does work! | LESLIEx317537 | Parkflyers | 91 | May 14, 2004 08:55 AM |
| GWS 370 Motor WON'T Re-Time | putt_13 | Power Systems | 4 | May 27, 2003 04:24 PM |
| Visual guide to timing your GWS 370 motor | Peter Khor | Parkflyers | 1 | Mar 05, 2003 06:08 PM |
| Timing of the GWS 300 motor | gorgeflyer | Power Systems | 7 | Feb 21, 2003 01:18 AM |
| How do you re-time the gws 370 motor? | sizam | Parkflyers | 3 | Oct 30, 2002 08:03 PM |