View Single Post
Old Jan 19, 2013, 05:43 PM
derp express is offline
Find More Posts by derp express
person
derp express's Avatar
Joined Dec 2012
176 Posts
The thrust measurements are static. I suspected that there might be a difference between static and dynamic thrust, and that maybe that was the issue, although I didn't realize how the magnitude of the difference.

All these numbers are rough approximations, yes. I determined that my average amp draw across a couple endurance flights was 5, by taking the MaH of the battery and diving it by the averages of the time aloft, which came out to ~0.5 hr. This gave me about 5A, which I then checked the thrust of by connecting the motor to a power meter and a scale, which is where I got the 245.

While my calculations are admittedly very rough, I'm willing to bet the issue is just static vs moving thrust, and the static thrust is making me think the aircraft has a tremendous drag coefficient.


As far as reynolds numbers are concerned, how severely does that impact a tiny, slow flying model's efficiency vs a large airplane?
derp express is offline Find More Posts by derp express
Reply With Quote