View Single Post
Old Dec 29, 2012, 03:58 PM
bulesz is offline
Find More Posts by bulesz
Registered User
bulesz's Avatar
Hungary EU
Joined May 2007
3,352 Posts
Originally Posted by Daryoon View Post
With the smaller plastmounts and smaller motor and LiPo used. The X1 sounds like a lighter quad. Interesting.

So the weight it sheds over it's v929/v949 counterpart is likely made up with the battery connector and hold down. Plus the additional plastic over underneath the canopy. And the larger, non SMD capacitor and resistors used on the board. No plugs so some weight savings there too.

Adding -50 expo really liven up the X1. Plus I had 125% for each of the channels. I didn't compare to see if there was a difference over the 100%. Just happen to be preprogrammed since I used the v929 model memory.

That said, the v929/v949 still feels like it's more responsive to the Turnigy 9x.

Right now, I haven't heard of a MQX sized quad that trumps the mQX.

My next quad will be the smaller, "sports cars", ladybird sized quads.

I hear the Hubsan X4 and the Vitality H36 are the two to beat. Both offering close to or same as the ladybird performance. Depends on who you ask of course. The Vitality H36 retains the FlySky compatibility.
Thanks guys for the infos! Sorry for the dumb question but Im new in 9X. Where did you set/add thr -50 expo?
bulesz is offline Find More Posts by bulesz
Reply With Quote