View Single Post
Old Dec 29, 2012, 03:33 PM
Daryoon is online now
Find More Posts by Daryoon
Team WarpSquad
Daryoon's Avatar
San Diego, CA
Joined Dec 2010
7,722 Posts
With the smaller plastic mounts and smaller motor and LiPo used. The X1 sounds like a lighter quad. Interesting.

So the weight it sheds over it's v929/v949 counterpart is likely made up with the battery connector and hold down. Plus the additional plastic over underneath the canopy. And the larger, non SMD capacitor and resistors used on the board. No plugs so some weight savings there too.

Adding -50 expo really liven up the X1. Plus I had 125% for each of the channels. I didn't compare to see if there was a difference over the 100%. Just happen to be preprogrammed since I used the v929 model memory.

That said, the v929/v949 still feels like it's more responsive to the Turnigy 9x.

Right now, I haven't heard of a MQX sized quad that trumps the mQX.

My next quad will be the smaller, "sports cars", ladybird sized quads.

I hear the Hubsan X4 and the Vitality H36 are the two to beat. Both offering close to or same as the ladybird performance. Depends on who you ask of course. The Vitality H36 retains the FlySky compatibility.
Daryoon is online now Find More Posts by Daryoon
Reply With Quote