Thread: Discussion Xplorer Mk. II
View Single Post
Old Nov 27, 2012, 02:40 PM
Tuomo is online now
Find More Posts by Tuomo
Registered User
Tuomo's Avatar
Jyvaskyla, Finland
Joined Aug 2003
2,525 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by SaltyOne View Post
I've also heard and read plenty of positive comments about the X2. I just haven't heard much about the X2 4 m. I love my X1 4 m, so I probably shouldn't even be thinking about an X2, but you know how it is with sailplanes.

George
Xp2 wing profile is so much more dymanic than Xp2. profile... One cannot compare then directly. In faster distance flight, when Xp1 starts to suffer in a bad way, Xp2 just goes :-)

Both planes will go up in a thermal. Also remember that structures have gotten much better since the Xp1 was introduced. We are now flying 10-15% (even more) lighter planes for same strength. You can also fly Xp2 with much less ballast. Light weight usually helps when in thermal.

And if everything else fails, add 2mm more camber
Tuomo is online now Find More Posts by Tuomo
Reply With Quote