View Single Post
Old Jul 09, 2012, 08:18 PM
The Kiwi is online now
Find More Posts by The Kiwi
Old Timer
The Kiwi's Avatar
USA, TX, San Antonio
Joined Jun 2010
984 Posts
My recollection is that it was one of several with a serious power deficiency

In the early 1950s, the companies producing jet engines made estimates of what the next development should able to do, and the pressure to keep up with the Red Menace was such that many designs were prepared based on those promises, so that when the latest engine was either a failure, or ended up producing far less power than predicted, the designs should have been cancelled.

But the Defense Dept was in such a rush, that tons of money would already have been spent, airframes would have been built, and rather than accept the losses, scrap the airframes, and go slower the next time, a last minute alteration in specs would be issued, to accept a lesser performance, or modify the airframes for a different engine.

The result wasn't always a disaster. The F-86D was always underpowered, but soldiered on remarkably well, as long as the pilots made appropriate allowances.

I suspect that the Cutlass design hit such a snag and was simply unable to fly adequately well with the limited power offered by the substitute.

The Kiwi is online now Find More Posts by The Kiwi
Reply With Quote