Thread: Discussion washout vs inverted tip section
View Single Post
Old May 26, 2012, 11:36 AM
kcaldwel is offline
Find More Posts by kcaldwel
naive realism
kcaldwel's Avatar
Joined Jan 2007
3,851 Posts
Airfoils produce lift both ways, no matter what the direction the camber is. An inverted airfoil just isn't very efficient at producing upwards lift - it's drag is higher than an upright cambered section when producing upwards lift, and the stall AoA from the chord line is lower. An airplane with a cambered airfoil can still fly inverted.

I have a little plank flying wing with an upside down Clark Y airfoil that flies pretty well. It doesn't need a reflexed airfoil because the negative Cm of the Clark Y becomes a positive Cm when it is inverted.

The stall behaviour of the airplane would likely not be noticeably different. You would still want to set the relative angles, including the induced angle of attack especially on a swept wing, so that the tips aren't stalled when the centre section stalls to prevent tip drop and incipient spins.

Kevin
kcaldwel is offline Find More Posts by kcaldwel
Last edited by kcaldwel; May 26, 2012 at 12:18 PM.
Reply With Quote