View Single Post
Old Mar 11, 2012, 08:56 AM
Bruce Abbott is offline
Find More Posts by Bruce Abbott
We want... Information!
Bruce Abbott's Avatar
Hastings, New Zealand
Joined Jan 2001
5,217 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by LMF5000 View Post
I take it that implies that removing the duct puts the motor under more strain even though it spins the same fan.
Depends on the particular fan and ducting. Generally, using a restricted tailpipe reduces thrust and fan loading. Good inlet ducting increases static thrust and fan loading. Poor ducting may do the opposite.

But just saying 'increases' or 'reduces' is not very useful without knowing how much it changes. Here are some real-world numbers (Haoye 7 blade 64mm fan, 3400Kv outrunner, 2S Lipo):-

Bare fan (no ducting): 134W, 22650rpm, 267g
With tailpipe 95% fsa: 132W, 22753rpm, 250g
Inlet ring and tailpipe: 151W, 22130rpm, 390g
In GWS ME262 nacelle: 153W, 22105rpm, 329g

Note that these are all static tests. Though using an inlet ring boosts static thrust significantly, it has little effect on in-flight thrust. A restricted tailpipe increases exhaust velocity, increasing thrust at high airspeed.

If the fan is for a slow model (eg. glider, airliner) then use a fat inlet ring and a short tailpipe opened up to 100% fsa (fan swept area). For a fast jet you can have long ducting, but keep the mouth thin (for lower drag), maintain inlet ducting at 100% fsa throughout its length, and restrict the outlet to 85% fsa.
Bruce Abbott is offline Find More Posts by Bruce Abbott
Reply With Quote