Originally Posted by Libelle201B
The "morality" issue falls flat on it's face given innocent, living, breathing human beings can also be taken out simply based on religious, political, judicial and military decisions. Given that, why are the unborn an exception?
Can you prove
your contention by providing for us a single case covered by your statement, in which it was legal
to *intentionally* target and kill a specific innocent person with killing
them being the full intent
and desired end result?
Or will we be treated to more moral evasions and psuedo equivalencies like other other pro abortion arguments?