After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?
View Single Post
Feb 29, 2012
, 06:12 PM
Joined Jan 2007
Originally Posted by
Here we see the effects of the moveable feast idea for morality combined with the very real slippery slope.
The authors apply the same pragmatic and utilitarian views used to justify abortion, and conclude that infanticide should be permitted under the same terms.
The wages of moral relativism are, in this case, advocacy of the deaths of living infants.
The "morality" issue falls flat on it's face given innocent, living, breathing human beings can also be taken out simply based on religious, political, judicial and military decisions. Given that, why are the unborn an exception?