View Single Post
Old Oct 21, 2010, 10:23 AM
viking60 is offline
Find More Posts by viking60
High Altitude Flyer
viking60's Avatar
Fairplay, South Park, CO
Joined Sep 2005
1,640 Posts
Turbulator Structures


KF stepped discontinuities are a type / class of turbulating structure which is very easily implemented when building with layers of flat foam sheet, FFF, etc..... but we may need to do some re-thinking, and be careful so that we don't fall into the trap of letting the commonly used material dimmensions dictate what shape / depth these structures assume.

KF steps are 'innies' - they are structures where the wing surface drops away from the contour of wing surface in front of it, forming a 'pocket' behind the KF step. This is a surface discontinuity where, in some cases, a circulating vortex may be captured while the wing is in flight.

Effective air boundary layer turbulating structures on a wing's surface can be either 'innies', or 'outies', and in some cases they can be merely more angular changes in the surface of a wing.

Old-timer & sailplane designers have known for a looooong time that using turbulator spar structures and 'trip strips' ('outies') on an airfoil's surface improves the performance of a wing. And the key to this is that even very minimal height / depth structures- (only 1/32" height for a trip strip) very effectively turbulate the boundary layer air flow, reducing surface layer separation bubbles across a wider range of angles of attack, and across a wider air speed range [for a given wing loading.]

How deep of a KF step / pocket we might want to use on various aircraft types for various desired flight performance envelopes is still a question that bears a lot of closer scrutiny and experimentation.

My recent testing on 'KF3" variant wing prototypes has been evaluating whether shallow depth KF variant stepped structures produce the same benefits (trapped circulating vortexes & turbulated boundary layer air flow) with less drag when compared to deeper stepped discontinuities. The subjective results of the KF3P prototype flight tests indicate that they do.

For making modifiable test wings where I can test deeper vs. shallower stepped structures, working with the various thicknesses of Depron & FFF is working well for me for now; I can add or change thicknesses by 1mm of foam at a time if I want, tape it in place, remove it again, and still keep a very clean and structurally sound wing structure throughout all of the various configurations. I can temporarily add other turbulator structures for some tests, too.

viking60 is offline Find More Posts by viking60
Last edited by viking60; Oct 21, 2010 at 12:39 PM.
Reply With Quote