View Single Post
Old Feb 26, 2010, 07:35 PM
DannyZRC is offline
Find More Posts by DannyZRC
Registered User
USA, CA, Merced
Joined Dec 2007
504 Posts
the A9 has more programming flexibility and will excel in non-standard applications where hand-wrought mixing is important.

if the quadcopter is such an application, then the A9 distinguishes itself.

if non-standard mixing isn't an issue, then the 8FG provides more outright performance in terms of latency response, but the A9 provides a more pleasant user interface and the novel telemetry feature.

the A9 is probably the better choice for anyone not already invested to FASST and also not overly concerned with latency.

the 8FG is still an excellent offering, but unless you're a competition flier I would say the A9's features are more everyday useful and provide for a better purchase.
DannyZRC is offline Find More Posts by DannyZRC
Reply With Quote