Originally Posted by QuietRCFly
I don't think the main goal of this design is 3D anyway, but would have to agree with you. I bet we could come up with a power option that would improve its performance for 3D however!
Correct. 3D was not the main design criteria. However, it remains true that the Samson II is a rather strong 3D performer (look at the wing loading... 9.8oz/foot!!)
And, No, you will not find a motor package in the world that will outperform the new ZS4025. "Money Back "Guaranteed. On strong 5S lipo with corrrect prop, the model can go from "mild" to ballistic 3D...