RC Groups

RC Groups
    Life, The Universe, and Politics
        Idea Universal background checks

#1 7oneWo1f Jan 30, 2013 09:09 PM

Universal background checks
 
There is a big problem in this country with free speech. While I and all good Americans support free speech, there are groups and individuals who use speech, often anonymously, to promote racism, homophobia, misogyny, pro-Christian religious bigotry, xenophobia, and for many other villainous purposes.

Other individuals use soeech anonymity to prowl internet hang outs used by our youth and take advantage of them.

Consequently, while defending the right to free speech, I propose that universal background checks be instituted to make sure that those practicing free speech are not going to use it for evil purposes.

Mentally ill, people under the age of 21, racists, homophobes, pedophiles, convicted felons, misogynists, Christian bigots, members of militia movements like the tea party, members of corporate terrorist organizations like the NRA, will thereby be prevented from using our constitutionally protected right to free speech for nefarious purposes.

On the other hand, free speech will be protected for the weakest among us, when funded by billionaires, such as advocating for the right of people here illegally to be granted amnesty.

If universal background checks are good enough for other amendments, it is certainly good enough for first and consequently most important amendment.

What say you?

#2 rcjetpilot Jan 30, 2013 09:36 PM

I actually heard a democratic “contributor” claim with certainty the NY Times “news” side has a hard wall between its “editorial” side… and firmly believes it. SO yes, I would tend to agree, we need a background check, home visitation, and a mental evaluation before they are allowed to exercise the first amendment.

#3 RCWorks Jan 30, 2013 09:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LoneWolfRC (Post 23985684)
If universal background checks are good enough for other amendments, it is certainly good enough for first and consequently most important amendment.

What say you?

Our president and his staff, friends and appointees need real background checks.

#4 Kenny Sharp Jan 31, 2013 04:04 AM

The difference between free speech and gun ownership, is that free speech doesn't kill... Guns kill.

#5 BE77 Pilot Jan 31, 2013 06:22 AM

Every time Mr Obama orders a new drone attack innocent children die.

#6 Pipemajor Jan 31, 2013 06:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RCWorks (Post 23986136)
Our president and his staff, friends and appointees need real background checks.

Are you suggesting Sheriff Joe take another crack at that? How about Sarah Palin? She needs a job now.

#7 Colt SAA Jan 31, 2013 06:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kenny Sharp (Post 23987920)
The difference between free speech and gun ownership, is that free speech doesn't kill... Guns kill.

Kenny,
You could not be more wrong. The spoken word is the most powerful force on earth. Even the bible speaks about this. I bet more people have been killed by words spoken than by guns.
Then there is the last part of your statement, "gun owndership" has never killed one single person

#8 BE77 Pilot Jan 31, 2013 06:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AintQytRite (Post 23988526)
Kenny,
You could not be more wrong. The spoken word is the most powerful force on earth. Even the bible speaks about this. I bet more people have been killed by words spoken than by guns.
Then there is the last part of your statement, "gun owndership" has never killed one single person

It's a paradox. :)

#9 FrankC Jan 31, 2013 07:18 AM

So, free speech only applies to people who agree with your viewpoint? What if at some point in the future someone is elected who does not agree with you, and suspends your right to speak your mind?

Quote:

Originally Posted by LoneWolfRC (Post 23985684)
There is a big problem in this country with free speech. While I and all good Americans support free speech, there are groups and individuals who use speech, often anonymously, to promote racism, homophobia, misogyny, pro-Christian religious bigotry, xenophobia, and for many other villainous purposes.

Other individuals use soeech anonymity to prowl internet hang outs used by our youth to prowl and take advantage of them.

Consequently, while defending the right to free speech, I propose that universal background checks be instituted to make sure that those practicing free speech are not going to use it for evil purposes.

Mentally ill, people under the age of 21, racists, homophobes, pedophiles, convicted felons, misogynists, Christian bigots, members of militia movements like the tea party, members of corporate terrorist organizations like the NRA, will thereby be prevented from using our constitutionally protected right to free speech for nefarious purposes.

On the other hand, free speech will be protected for the weakest among us, when funded by billionaires, such as advocating for the right of people here illegally to be granted amnesty.

If universal background checks are good enough for other amendments, it is certainly good enough for first and consequently most important amendment.

What say you?


#10 LcJ Jan 31, 2013 08:04 AM

Let me get this straight now. The government wants universal background checks and right now:

They don't know how many illegals are in this country

They cannot tell who is and isn't for employee identification

They say getting the program for workforce identification will cost a fortune and will be five years to get off the ground

They cannot even keep people in jail because they don't have the space

They don't want to require voter ID to vote


And with all these problems, they want to create another monster that will still not stop criminals from getting or using guns and will only put another burden on honest, taxpaying citizens.

Shame on them who want to do such.

#11 BE77 Pilot Jan 31, 2013 08:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LcJ (Post 23989014)
Let me get this straight now. The government wants universal background checks and right now:

They don't know how many illegals are in this country

They cannot tell who is and isn't for employee identification

They say getting the program for workforce identification will cost a fortune and will be five years to get off the ground

They cannot even keep people in jail because they don't have the space

They don't want to require voter ID to vote


And with all these problems, they want to create another monster that will still not stop criminals from getting or using guns and will only put another burden on honest, taxpaying citizens.

Shame on them who want to do such.

Post of the day. ;)

#12 Kenny Sharp Jan 31, 2013 08:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AintQytRite (Post 23988526)
Kenny,
You could not be more wrong. The spoken word is the most powerful force on earth. Even the bible speaks about this. I bet more people have been killed by words spoken than by guns.
Then there is the last part of your statement, "gun owndership" has never killed one single person

Words do not kill.
Words may indeed incite people to kill, but then those people will pick up weapons designed to kill.

#13 LcJ Jan 31, 2013 08:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kenny Sharp (Post 23989028)
Words do not kill.
Words may indeed incite people to kill, but then those people will pick up weapons designed to kill.

If you look at that statement correctly it isn't the words that are the problem.

Matthew 12:34
O generation of vipers, how can ye, being evil, speak good things? for out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh.

Matthew 15:18
But those things which proceed out of the mouth come forth from the heart; and they defile the man.

Luke 6:45
A good man out of the good treasure of his heart bringeth forth that which is good; and an evil man out of the evil treasure of his heart bringeth forth that which is evil: for of the abundance of the heart his mouth speaketh.

Evil brings forth evil for such will not ring true with those who are good and only those with evil in their heart will be stirred to action.

#14 wrightme Jan 31, 2013 08:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kenny Sharp (Post 23989028)
Words do not kill.
Words may indeed incite people to kill, but then those people will pick up weapons designed to kill.

Or not.

Killing doesn't happen only with weapons designed to kill.

#15 Leather Helmet Jan 31, 2013 08:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LcJ (Post 23989274)
If you look at that statement correctly it isn't the words that are the problem.

Matthew 12:34
O generation of vipers, how can ye, being evil, speak good things? for out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh.

Matthew 15:18
But those things which proceed out of the mouth come forth from the heart; and they defile the man.

Luke 6:45
A good man out of the good treasure of his heart bringeth forth that which is good; and an evil man out of the evil treasure of his heart bringeth forth that which is evil: for of the abundance of the heart his mouth speaketh.

Evil brings forth evil for such will not ring true with those who are good and only those with evil in their heart will be stirred to action.

This one, ALONG WITH, Lcj,s post, are the posts of the day, for this thread. Folks may not believe in the Bible, but they cannot deny the truth it speaks. I submit, if you dont see the truth in those words, you cannot see the truth in anything!!


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:41 AM.