RC Groups

RC Groups
    Multirotor Talk
        Discussion Mikrokopter / UAVP / quadrocopter / quadrotor build -- Part 2

#1 Arthur P. Nov 10, 2010 04:47 PM

Mikrokopter / UAVP / quadrocopter / quadrotor build -- Part 2
 
Kept the thread title the same, but this thread really focusses on the Mikrokopter based multikopters.


This is a continuation of the oversized "Mikrokopter / UAVP / quadrocopter / quadrotor build" thread (http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=716870). Due to the huge number of responses that thread was starting to affect database efficiency in the forum.

I do hope this second part does not grow so excessively as the original thread did. Now that the multikopters are starting to mature, it would probably be better if people start their own build threads, or start threads on very specific topics such as camera mounts with roll and tilt stabilisation, multikopter frames, reducing mikrokopter vibration like instability through parameters, etc, etc.

#2 13brv3 Nov 10, 2010 05:10 PM

We've had this conversation a number of times, and nothing changes in the course of the thread. I actually prefer that it stay a discussion thread like it is, because it's much easier to search.

I would probably vote to make this thread for MK only, and remove the UAVP, and general quad references from the subject. There's a whole forum for general multi-rotor info now, and UAVP/X has it's own thread of course.

Cheers,
Rusty

#3 nikivan Nov 10, 2010 05:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 13brv3 (Post 16519072)
We've had this conversation a number of times, and nothing changes in the course of the thread. I actually prefer that it stay a discussion thread like it is, because it's much easier to search.

I would probably vote to make this thread for MK only, and remove the UAVP, and general quad references from the subject. There's a whole forum for general multi-rotor info now, and UAVP/X has it's own thread of course.

Cheers,
Rusty

I agree with this.

#4 Coil Nov 10, 2010 05:19 PM

I'm for MK dedicated thread too.

#5 saabguyspg Nov 10, 2010 07:00 PM

I love it that we crashed the server... lol... I am for MK thread too... unless you know everyone one here like us old boys then you may think someone is flying a MK but really it's a UAVX etc....

Steve

#6 jesolins Nov 10, 2010 08:01 PM

Hi Arthur,
I also agree that this should now just be renamed as a Mikrokopter issues thread as it has been mosly focused on the MK now for quite some time.
Thanks for starting the original thread and providing all the information and helping getting us get started on the MK!;)
Cheers,
Jim

#7 simonjardine Nov 10, 2010 09:23 PM

Its MK all the way for me:D

Simon

#8 va3mw Nov 10, 2010 09:31 PM

delete

#9 dmsgodeep Nov 11, 2010 01:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by simonjardine (Post 16521056)
Mike, i have a quad here which kept on peeping and peeping, apparently a I2C issue, well guess what? It's gone now
New firmware works well, i have had several flights with several different crafts today, i would recommend it to anyone and everyone ...

If you crash then you know who to blame... Holger
Simon

Simon

Simon,
So I have the intermittent peeping as well on my Octo. It seems to do it more and more.
So all you did was upgrade to the new firmware without any other changes...and now it's gone?

I was going to re-wire my octo with a disro board...but if this firmware fixes it...maybe I won't have to. Cool.

Thanks,
Brent

#10 wavess Nov 11, 2010 02:58 AM

MK thread also for me seems more reasonable

#11 simonjardine Nov 11, 2010 03:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dmsgodeep (Post 16522291)
Simon,
So I have the intermittent peeping as well on my Octo. It seems to do it more and more.
So all you did was upgrade to the new firmware without any other changes...and now it's gone?

I was going to re-wire my octo with a disro board...but if this firmware fixes it...maybe I won't have to. Cool.

Thanks,
Brent

worked for me Brent, It might just work for you:rolleyes:
Simon

#12 va3mw Nov 11, 2010 09:57 AM

New Hexa
 
1 Attachment(s)
I just finished building a new (and) first Hexa for me.

The BL-Ctrl's are running v0.42 and the FC is at 0.82.

Since I had some Robby 2824-34's and a pile of EPP1045's I decide to use those just to get started.

One not to those using the Robby's. Make sure you use very shallow screws when mounting them. It is easy to screw into the power lead. You will know if you do that as the ESC won't power up completely and when you give it throttle, the ESC will go offline and the RED led will flash 10 times.

That being said, with the out of the box settings, she flies very well. Even without altitude hold, she hold her altitude much better than my quad. No Navi, GPS or Compass installed (yet).

All up weight with a 3S 4900maH Rhino battery is 1.7kg.

I am using Rusty's frame, landing gear and I2C isolator. Futaba 8FG and the OMM converter. I am also trying out Rusty's vibration motor mounts.

#13 wavess Nov 11, 2010 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mitmit
Well guys,
I just got mk working with 12fg and s-bus rx with all 12 channels without any converters!
did not fly it yet, will report later..

many thanks to Kristoffer from DK.

happy happy)

what happened with this finally? d you have more info?

#14 don_cocinero Nov 11, 2010 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 13brv3 (Post 16519072)
We've had this conversation a number of times, and nothing changes in the course of the thread. I actually prefer that it stay a discussion thread like it is, because it's much easier to search.

I would probably vote to make this thread for MK only, and remove the UAVP, and general quad references from the subject. There's a whole forum for general multi-rotor info now, and UAVP/X has it's own thread of course.

Cheers,
Rusty

Let me make a prediction here: You may dedicate the thread to the MK, but you will find that after not too long it will go the way of all the others. That is, it will resemble a dogs breakfast as far as organisation of information goes.
I do not mean this in any derogatory sense, it's just the nature of the beast.:)
To understand why this happens we need to first agree on the reason why the thread exists. Is it because we want to provide a ready source of reference & how-to info for new builders (prospective owners of MKs), or do we want to have a social hub for experienced MK owners to exchange views and opinions. Because IMHO you cannot have both. Unfortunately the MK wiki is not adequate as a reference source for the rank beginner but then again I would argue that if you have never built anything, the MK is not the place to start but again that is IMHO. :D
Why can't you have both? In my view this model (information exchange framework) is good for random exchanges between individuals but not good as an ordered source of ready reference on all the topics that go to make up a successful build - so you disenfranchise the newbies. Some people have tried to cater for this by setting up build logs on the first page....but this requires sustained attention and maintenance - two casualties of a random post system designed for ad-hoc exchanges.
Not going to get into the full analysis of this style of medium and it's benefits/shortcomings in this style of application here - The essence of my argument is that you are attempting to solve multiple problems with a tool that can provide only one solution. Admirable, but futile.

Cheers
Don

#15 saabguyspg Nov 11, 2010 04:55 PM

good point Don I never though of that before...

we should make a point then to state the platform we are talking about when posting.

Steve


Quote:

Originally Posted by don_cocinero (Post 16527551)
Let me make a prediction here: You may dedicate the thread to the MK, but you will find that after not too long it will go the way of all the others. That is, it will resemble a dogs breakfast as far as organisation of information goes.
I do not mean this in any derogatory sense, it's just the nature of the beast.:)
To understand why this happens we need to first agree on the reason why the thread exists. Is it because we want to provide a ready source of reference & how-to info for new builders (prospective owners of MKs), or do we want to have a social hub for experienced MK owners to exchange views and opinions. Because IMHO you cannot have both. Unfortunately the MK wiki is not adequate as a reference source for the rank beginner but then again I would argue that if you have never built anything, the MK is not the place to start but again that is IMHO. :D
Why can't you have both? In my view this model (information exchange framework) is good for random exchanges between individuals but not good as an ordered source of ready reference on all the topics that go to make up a successful build - so you disenfranchise the newbies. Some people have tried to cater for this by setting up build logs on the first page....but this requires sustained attention and maintenance - two casualties of a random post system designed for ad-hoc exchanges.
Not going to get into the full analysis of this style of medium and it's benefits/shortcomings in this style of application here - The essence of my argument is that you are attempting to solve multiple problems with a tool that can provide only one solution. Admirable, but futile.

Cheers
Don



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:08 PM.