Photons
Oct 17, 2008, 07:34 PM
As a hobby UAS/UAV pilot who sees the incredible commercial potential for our flying robots, I think it is important for our community to work to create regulations rather than hide from them.
Keeping a safe airspace is in all of our interests, and to that end, ADS-B (http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ato/service_units/enroute/surveillance_broadcast/) seems like a perfect solution to me. Properly implemented, a system like this should allow us to coexist in the airspace without the burden of flight plans. We would also benefit from the increased situational awareness afforded by this system, as many ground based hazards such as bridges, antenna, buildings, etc. will broadcast their position to this system as well.
I think that all good aircraft engineers try to make every component on the craft do more than one thing if possible. With that in mind, we can use the ADS-B for purposes other than just boring old safety. Ground station antenna tracking and lost craft location are two important secondary uses that come to mind. I know that incorporating another Tx on our vehicles seems like a pain in the *ss, but we can figure this out.
I have had some very positive discussions with the staff of my Congressman (John Salazar) and the Sheriff's Department in my county. Everyone sees the incredible applications for flying robots and remote sensing, and they WILL become a normal part of our world. We just need to remember that bureaucrats are not innovators, we are the innovators and it is up to us to find the solutions.
Does anyone have an opinion on the ADS-B system, or the idea of using it to drive a ground station tracking antenna?
Keeping a safe airspace is in all of our interests, and to that end, ADS-B (http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ato/service_units/enroute/surveillance_broadcast/) seems like a perfect solution to me. Properly implemented, a system like this should allow us to coexist in the airspace without the burden of flight plans. We would also benefit from the increased situational awareness afforded by this system, as many ground based hazards such as bridges, antenna, buildings, etc. will broadcast their position to this system as well.
I think that all good aircraft engineers try to make every component on the craft do more than one thing if possible. With that in mind, we can use the ADS-B for purposes other than just boring old safety. Ground station antenna tracking and lost craft location are two important secondary uses that come to mind. I know that incorporating another Tx on our vehicles seems like a pain in the *ss, but we can figure this out.
I have had some very positive discussions with the staff of my Congressman (John Salazar) and the Sheriff's Department in my county. Everyone sees the incredible applications for flying robots and remote sensing, and they WILL become a normal part of our world. We just need to remember that bureaucrats are not innovators, we are the innovators and it is up to us to find the solutions.
Does anyone have an opinion on the ADS-B system, or the idea of using it to drive a ground station tracking antenna?