PDA

View Full Version : Discussion Looking for IMU shock absorber


fuju
Jun 04, 2008, 03:07 AM
I am looking for a shock absorber used on IMU and other inertial systems. This shock absorber is used for resisting high requency shock on UVA's motor.
Can anybody recommend one for me? Thanks a lot!

airmcn_3
Jun 04, 2008, 12:45 PM
Here is what I have been using. I build mine so I can select the density of my grommets. Some units need to be a bit more rigid then others....

Hope this helps,

Chris

Jack Crossfire
Jun 04, 2008, 05:40 PM
High frequency vibration is a buster. This foam isolates most of it, but not all. MEMS suck overall in high frequency vibration. Another idea is using 2 of each MEMS component, oriented in opposite directions, to try to cancel out vibration skewing.

fuju
Jun 04, 2008, 09:46 PM
Thank you very much!
I am using a MEMS IMU and AHRS on a UVA. The high frequency vibration bothers me a lot. I tried some methods but they does not work. So I prefer some mature products(shock absorbers) that designed for inertial units only. Is there any company produce this kind of shock absorbers?

airmcn_3
Jun 04, 2008, 10:34 PM
Thank you very much!
I am using a MEMS IMU and AHRS on a UVA. The high frequency vibration bothers me a lot. I tried some methods but they does not work. So I prefer some mature products(shock absorbers) that designed for inertial units only. Is there any company produce this kind of shock absorbers?



http://www.generalsilicones.com/damper.html

fuju
Jun 06, 2008, 09:11 PM
airmcn_3
Thank you very much. You helped me a lot.I will contact with them.

airmcn_3
Jun 06, 2008, 11:40 PM
airmcn_3
Thank you very much. You helped me a lot.I will contact with them.


No problem, thats what we are here for.

Good luck!

Chris

dalbert02
Jun 07, 2008, 01:21 PM
Try sorbothane.
-dave

airmcn_3
Jun 07, 2008, 06:20 PM
Try sorbothane.
-dave


Dave,

Thanks for the name!

Here is the link to make it a bit easier.


Chris

http://www.sorbothane.com/

fuju
Jun 09, 2008, 11:13 PM
Chris and Dave
Thanks a lot. It is very helpful.
Good luck!

ashvani
Jun 18, 2008, 01:08 AM
@fuju

plz share info if u find some solution to meet ur requirements...

ashvani
Jun 18, 2008, 01:10 AM
@ Jack

did u try two sensors in reverse orientation method? And cud u eliminate the vibrations.. ?

Jack Crossfire
Jun 19, 2008, 11:28 PM
The high frequencies were eliminated with a tiny modification to the padding. The IMU & airframe needed at least 1/2" of padding in all directions yet enough contact to reduce low frequency vibrations. There are no dual sensors. If you're worried about commercial solutions, in China all products are home made.