DeaninMilwaukee
Apr 20, 2008, 05:04 PM
I'm in the planing stages of doing a 1/2 scale Stits fly baby: http://www.airventuremuseum.org/collection/aircraft/Stits%20Sky%20Baby.asp that I will be powering with a123's and started thinking about what would be the most reliable RX power source possible.
After finding out that the CC bec is programable at 0.1v increments, I came up with the idea of setting it right at the voltage a full rx battery would be, ( 5.4v?) for the purpose of keeping the rx batt " topped up" at all times.
Done this way, you'd have the " always charged " convenience of a bec only system, with the safety of a built in backup battery taking over seamlessly if the bec or main flight battery should ever fail, or the the other way around with the BEC taking over if the on/off switch or rx battery would fail in the rx batt half of the system.
Wiring would be very simple, ( y harness), and the only real downside seems to be the small weight penalty of the RX battery.
So what do you guys think? Am I missing a good reason that this is a bad idea?
Dean in Milwaukee
After finding out that the CC bec is programable at 0.1v increments, I came up with the idea of setting it right at the voltage a full rx battery would be, ( 5.4v?) for the purpose of keeping the rx batt " topped up" at all times.
Done this way, you'd have the " always charged " convenience of a bec only system, with the safety of a built in backup battery taking over seamlessly if the bec or main flight battery should ever fail, or the the other way around with the BEC taking over if the on/off switch or rx battery would fail in the rx batt half of the system.
Wiring would be very simple, ( y harness), and the only real downside seems to be the small weight penalty of the RX battery.
So what do you guys think? Am I missing a good reason that this is a bad idea?
Dean in Milwaukee