PDA

View Full Version : Blade 400 impressions


Skywise
Apr 15, 2008, 11:36 PM
First a qualifier, I'm a very new pilot. I haven't done much more
than hover and zig zag back and forth a bit. But I just picked
up a Blade 400 and damn am I impressed.

My introduction to heli's was with a co-axial ESky Lama V4. I
got that down pretty quick and decided instead of putting money
into upgrade parts and more blades, I instead bought a Blade CPPro.

That was a fun machine to learn on. A tad touchy to say the least,
but as I have since learned, it's much due to it's small mass. As
my abilities have progressed, I started to run into a limitation
of the design - the tail rotor motor. I'd be flying around just
great and then suddenly be warned that my battery was running low
by the fact that I had reduced tail authority demonstrated by my
sudden inability to recover from that simple spin I just did. This
resulted in a lot a blade changes which was becoming discouraging.

I've only had two flights with the 400 and haven't done anything
but hover as it's a tad windy, but it's a breeze to fly. The
response is positive and crisp. Handling the wind isn't as hard
as the CPPro. I did notice it seems to hit translational lift
much quicker than the CPPro when hit by a wind gust. (unlike other
newbs being discussed, I know that wind gusts can cause TL in
a hover) I think this is likely due to the much higher head speed.

Tail authority is bang on. But then, the heading hold gyro is sure
to be helping there. I really like the fact that as the battery
dies I do not loose tail control, no doubt due to being a belt
drive.

Further re the battery, I rellay like the fact that as you wind
down the battery, the ESC drops power automatically and smoothly.
There is no loss of contral as you lose power.

My only concern at the moment is that battery time seems short.
But that can be remidied in any number of ways.

I haven't even gone through the manual on the new DX6i radio, but
the feel is smooth. I definitaly can feel the difference in the
resolution of the controls compared to the previous radio.

All in all, I am looking forward to my flying future.

Now ducking for cover from Beav ;)

Brian
--
http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism
Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html
Quake "predictions": http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html
Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes?

danny
Apr 17, 2008, 10:44 AM
This was insightful. Thank you.

As a Blade Cx2 owner, I've thought of moving on to a CP Pro--without
ever knowing about the weight or tail control issues. I think I'll
stick with my current helicopter for a while longer and eventually get
a Blade 400.

Thanks again. This is what these forums are made for.

Skywise
Apr 17, 2008, 11:20 PM
danny <dhabtem1@gmail.com> wrote in news:4cc57d2f-7ac5-424a-8bfc-552912341289
@f36g2000hsa.googlegroups.com:

> This was insightful. Thank you.
>
> As a Blade Cx2 owner, I've thought of moving on to a CP Pro--without
> ever knowing about the weight or tail control issues. I think I'll
> stick with my current helicopter for a while longer and eventually get
> a Blade 400.
>
> Thanks again. This is what these forums are made for.

You're welcome. From my own experience, though, I did find the
CPPRo useful for learning the nuances of collective pitch. I
mean, I already knew them in theory being an armchair pilot
for the last 25 years, but your fingers need to learn how to
touch the controls just right. There is a finesse to flying
these. I've learned that much already. You have to think ahead
of the machine.

Don't forget your training gear, though. Heck, I made mine.
two 3/8" dowels, some practice golfballs, and zip ties should
work fine (I used rubber bands).

Brian
--
http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism
Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html
Quake "predictions": http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html
Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes?

Beav
Apr 18, 2008, 05:57 PM
"danny" <dhabtem1@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:4cc57d2f-7ac5-424a-8bfc-552912341289@f36g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
> This was insightful. Thank you.
>
> As a Blade Cx2 owner, I've thought of moving on to a CP Pro--without
> ever knowing about the weight or tail control issues. I think I'll
> stick with my current helicopter for a while longer and eventually get
> a Blade 400.
>
> Thanks again. This is what these forums are made for.

These forums were made in God's image and don't you forget it.


--
Beav

VN 750
Zed 1000
OMF# 19