Johndou
Nov 28, 2007, 12:02 PM
I apologize in advance if this is the wrong place for this topic. But, I felt it related to “Simulators” and is important enough to discuss.
I own RealFlight G3.5 and have been a member of the Forums on KnifeEdge Software’s webpage since Aug. of last year.
Jim Bourke had responded to a reply that I had made on the KnifeEdge forums webpage. I had noticed that one particular user seemed to yield more power then even some of the admins and I essentially questioned him as being affiliated with KE Software. As an example he had known that the IP address of one User was the same as another - one user with two different user names. Jim had responded to say that the particular User that I had questioned had no affiliation with KE. Something quite unusual for the General Manager to response to a post. I then asked Jim how this person could have the information that he did and be capable of doing what he had done on the site if he was not affiliated with KE. Jim's response was short, not at all to the point, sarcastic and a bit disrespectful - although he did suggest that the discussion be taken off-line. To which I responded with a PM (private message) directly to Jim Bourke asking him essentially what I had been asking all along - how could this user know ... if he was not affiliated with KE?
I was immediately banned from the site.
A very immature response and completely unprofessional. Although I guess it pretty much answered my question.
To be lied to by Jim Bourke and then when called on his lie to be retaliated against is so far beyond professional that I would consider it childish.
I may be only one person but the people that I fly with, the clubs that I belong to and the new people that I meet and train represent far more then just one person.
Why would the President, General Manager of a company want to retaliate against a customer and place the reputation of his company in jeopardy over such a trivial matter?
By the way when I asked why I was banned this was the response:
Hi John.
The reason your account was removed from the Knife Edge Forums is because it was determined that trying to convince you that a fellow forums user is not affiliated with us is not a worthwhile use of our time. You are "representing" Knife Edge just as much as anyone else on the forums is, except that when you repeatedly make false claims and accusations despite our efforts to correct them and treat other users (including Jim Bourke) with disrespect and sarcasm, you are misrepresenting Knife Edge.
Adam Taylor
Software Developer
Knife Edge Software
There was never a response to my allegation. Okay, maybe I was a bit sarcastic. “Sure Jim, rrriiiigghhtt, he’s not affiliated ... so the how did he know ...”
As I understand it now, I was to take Jim’s word for it and just drop it... even though I “knew” otherwise. It’s obvious that the guy’s a “spy” hired by KE to watch the Forums. If I’ve noticed it, then I’m sure several others have too. But, why? Why jeopardize your job, your career, your company over something so trivial, when a simple response would have sufficed? “He’s not affiliated with KE he got his information from .... an admin at KE when he called to complain ...” or whatever the truth is. Instead I got “... is not affiliated with KE ...”; “I’m not here to change your ‘feelings’ about another user ... take it offline ...” When I followed those instructions I was banned from the site ... strange. Or, is this normal for Jim Bourke?
I own RealFlight G3.5 and have been a member of the Forums on KnifeEdge Software’s webpage since Aug. of last year.
Jim Bourke had responded to a reply that I had made on the KnifeEdge forums webpage. I had noticed that one particular user seemed to yield more power then even some of the admins and I essentially questioned him as being affiliated with KE Software. As an example he had known that the IP address of one User was the same as another - one user with two different user names. Jim had responded to say that the particular User that I had questioned had no affiliation with KE. Something quite unusual for the General Manager to response to a post. I then asked Jim how this person could have the information that he did and be capable of doing what he had done on the site if he was not affiliated with KE. Jim's response was short, not at all to the point, sarcastic and a bit disrespectful - although he did suggest that the discussion be taken off-line. To which I responded with a PM (private message) directly to Jim Bourke asking him essentially what I had been asking all along - how could this user know ... if he was not affiliated with KE?
I was immediately banned from the site.
A very immature response and completely unprofessional. Although I guess it pretty much answered my question.
To be lied to by Jim Bourke and then when called on his lie to be retaliated against is so far beyond professional that I would consider it childish.
I may be only one person but the people that I fly with, the clubs that I belong to and the new people that I meet and train represent far more then just one person.
Why would the President, General Manager of a company want to retaliate against a customer and place the reputation of his company in jeopardy over such a trivial matter?
By the way when I asked why I was banned this was the response:
Hi John.
The reason your account was removed from the Knife Edge Forums is because it was determined that trying to convince you that a fellow forums user is not affiliated with us is not a worthwhile use of our time. You are "representing" Knife Edge just as much as anyone else on the forums is, except that when you repeatedly make false claims and accusations despite our efforts to correct them and treat other users (including Jim Bourke) with disrespect and sarcasm, you are misrepresenting Knife Edge.
Adam Taylor
Software Developer
Knife Edge Software
There was never a response to my allegation. Okay, maybe I was a bit sarcastic. “Sure Jim, rrriiiigghhtt, he’s not affiliated ... so the how did he know ...”
As I understand it now, I was to take Jim’s word for it and just drop it... even though I “knew” otherwise. It’s obvious that the guy’s a “spy” hired by KE to watch the Forums. If I’ve noticed it, then I’m sure several others have too. But, why? Why jeopardize your job, your career, your company over something so trivial, when a simple response would have sufficed? “He’s not affiliated with KE he got his information from .... an admin at KE when he called to complain ...” or whatever the truth is. Instead I got “... is not affiliated with KE ...”; “I’m not here to change your ‘feelings’ about another user ... take it offline ...” When I followed those instructions I was banned from the site ... strange. Or, is this normal for Jim Bourke?