View Full Version : Discussion Flying Styro A7 Corsair
Figure9
Jun 27, 2006, 06:24 AM
I just aquired a complete package including the kit, Hitec radio, Jeti esc, nimh battery, brushed motor, Vesa55 fan and nimh charger. I typically don't follow the jet forums, so I'm wondering if this kit is OK in its stock form. Do I need any mods? It looks like its the package Hobby Lobby sells for $350.00, but I don't see the A7 anymore. Was this discontinued? Any info would be appreciated. Thanks
dave morris
Jun 27, 2006, 07:38 AM
Most reports have been that with a stock brushed motor and Nimh cells will result in a very sedate flying jet. If you want it to fly well as with most jets you will need to use a BL motor and lipo to get good peformance. A light BL motor with a KV of around 4000 will work well with a 3s Lipo that can handle up to 15 amps. Should get you around 150 watts. Keeping it light is key to survival of those kind of foamie jets. Also IIRC there needs to be a cheater inlet put it. I am sure you will find all kinds of data if you use the search. It is a older topic so the battery and motor data may be a little out of date.
Dukester
Jun 27, 2006, 12:59 PM
I picked up one of these from a guy on here recently. Not a bad looking plane, but he's right about the cheater inlet, there's no where near enough area on the intake as molded.
One thing my plane was missing was elevators. I'd really apreciate it if you could post a few pics of your elevators and maybe dimensions as I need to cut some new ones and would like them to be close to right.
Thanks,
Duke
Figure9
Jun 27, 2006, 01:48 PM
Thank for all the input so far. I'll take a look at the elevators tonight and post a picture and the dimensions.
bruff
Jun 27, 2006, 02:06 PM
The inlet is fine. No cheater hole is required. I use to fly this with a red flame blaster EDF unit. Flew very well. Contact EJF.com Robert may still have the conversion instructions he put out.
Bob
PS See http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=5098&highlight=flying+Styro+a+7 This may help.
Dukester
Jun 27, 2006, 02:42 PM
Bob,
I'll have to measure again more carefully, but on mine, the inlet area is well under 75% of the fan FSA. I'm pretty new to edf, but my homework says optimally inlet > FSA > exhaust.
Which brings up another general question, some guys talk about swept area and some talk about frontal area. How does swept area figure into proper ducting?
Duke
Figure9
Jun 27, 2006, 04:00 PM
Here are some pictures of the elevator.
Dukester
Jun 27, 2006, 04:27 PM
Thanks for the pics. I can just trace over the pics to scale and print a template. Very helpful.
Duke
bruff
Jun 27, 2006, 06:14 PM
You are correct it is 75% FSA but it did not affect how this plane flew. I think because the way it was set up it had an inlet duct not an opened area. The build instructions from EJF will help explain this.
Bob
AirX
Jun 27, 2006, 07:35 PM
Bob,
I'll have to measure again more carefully, but on mine, the inlet area is well under 75% of the fan FSA. I'm pretty new to edf, but my homework says optimally inlet > FSA > exhaust.
Which brings up another general question, some guys talk about swept area and some talk about frontal area. How does swept area figure into proper ducting?
Duke
Frontal area is used in drag calculations, frontal area of the duct that is exposed to the airflow will generate drag at speeds that produce airflow faster than the fan can process.
Fan Swept Area, think of the it this way. Air cannot flow thru the motor so physics says that for every rpm of the rotor the area the air flows thru minus the motor/motor holder/spinner will produce a defined volume of air thru it, as it leaves that FSA it enters an outlet duct that has more area available to move the air into so the airflow slows down as it fills the extra volume, if you have a reduced outlet of at least maximum area the same as FSA the flow will regenerate its velocity, if the outlet is constant tubular in section to the outlet it will lose that energy and velocity and it will be somewhat slower than the energy and velocity originally put into it. The physical law that governs this phenomenon is called "Conservation of Mass", if the there is nothing added or taken away then mass will be constant.
Hope this helps.
Eric B.
dave morris
Jun 28, 2006, 10:52 AM
You are correct it is 75% FSA but it did not affect how this plane flew. I think because the way it was set up it had an inlet duct not an opened area. The build instructions from EJF will help explain this.
Bob
Oh I did not think it had an inlet duct, in that case a cheater would just mess things up.
BTW my comments are just from what I recall reading about this little jet, don't want to mislead anyone.
Ed Waldrep
Jun 28, 2006, 11:10 AM
I don't think the kit comes with an inlet duct but I could be wrong. Maybe Bob added one?
bruff
Jun 28, 2006, 11:36 AM
I found the build pictures. I stand corrected. I did use a cheater hole. See the enclosed pictures.
Bob
bruff
Jun 28, 2006, 11:39 AM
One more set of pictures.
Bob
Dukester
Jun 28, 2006, 01:16 PM
Thanks for the pics. How did you actually drive the elevator? I couldn't tell exactly from the pics.
Duke
bruff
Jun 28, 2006, 03:20 PM
Hope these pictures help.
Bob
Dukester
Jun 28, 2006, 04:22 PM
Bob,
Thanks, I see what you did.
I just realized I've totally hijacked figure9's thread. :rolleyes: Hopefully he'll forgive me.
Duke
Figure9
Jun 28, 2006, 04:48 PM
I don't mind at all! I have been learning alot. The amount of information you guys have is amazing.
bruff
Jun 28, 2006, 05:20 PM
Makes me what to build another with the new power systems.
bob
Figure9
Jul 08, 2006, 05:28 PM
Well, I think I'm going to sell this package. Check out the classifieds:
Here (http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=540102)
KOOLSTRADER
Feb 13, 2008, 04:42 PM
We have a few of these flying styro corsairs in stock, and the f-16 by flying styro, nice jets, really nice scale looks. requires a good builder who can install everything, and use some engineering skills to make certain things work. In the air, very fast , or seems very fast because of its small size. You want to turn, good luck. the only way is to Bank it and Crank it
skill level for these 8-10
flew jets already, at least 2-3 different types
both flying styro jets in stock at
RC WORLD INTERNATIONAL inc
RADIO CONTROL HOBBY
WWW.RCWORLD.US
tail-heavy
Feb 13, 2008, 04:51 PM
We have a few of these flying styro corsairs in stock, and the f-16 by flying styro, nice jets, really nice scale looks. requires a good builder who can install everything, and use some engineering skills to make certain things work. In the air, very fast , or seems very fast because of its small size. You want to turn, good luck. the only way is to Bank it and Crank it
skill level for these 8-10
flew jets already, at least 2-3 different types
both flying styro jets in stock at
RC WORLD INTERNATIONAL inc
RADIO CONTROL HOBBY
WWW.RCWORLD.US
Thanks.
kevin
Feb 13, 2008, 08:12 PM
here is a review i did of this plane 5 years ago. obviously there are way more and better power choices these days but it should give you a good idea about the plane as a whole.
http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=197402
vBulletin® Copyright ©2000-2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.