further copyright discussion

[KurtHübener]

Malc C just gave a perfect example for trolling.

The rest was ok, use this link (http://www.reflex-sim.dyndns.org/reflex-sim/shop/catalog/faqdesk_index.php?faqPath=15_35_45_54) to see the right connector you need.

[Malc C]

Malc C just gave a perfect example for trolling.

The rest was ok, use this link (http://www.reflex-sim.dyndns.org/reflex-sim/shop/catalog/faqdesk_index.php?faqPath=15_35_45_54) to see the right connector you need.

Oh Kurt.. you were obviously at the back of the queue when they were giving out a sense of humor :)

[rutat]

Kurt, Malc is technically correct - any image on the Reflex site _IS_ copyrighted and cannot be published without the consent of WSN et al. You can't have it both ways. However, he could legally post a link to the image (as you did) and there is NOTHING that you or WSN could do. Ask any pro. Please lighten up.

[KurtHübener]

"Oh Kurt.. you were obviously at the back of the queue when they were giving out a sense of humor"

Not really. Normally, I'm quite reasonable but especially that thread made me loose my sense of humor. As you may agree there is nothing to lough about in that exchange.

[KurtHübener]

Rutat, want to start a new copyright fight here? Ask Jim if he wants to go through all this all over again and I will tell you ruight away, I won't participate in such a sensless discussion with you or anybody else. If you want to teach the rest of the world your funny ideas about copyrights - please go ahead, open your own forum and do whatever you want.

Dionyssios was asking for a simple solution and I provided the answer. You want to hijack this thread again for your own intention? Let me see what RSG rule applies here:

Overbumping?
The post does not contain relevant information and was made purely to keep the poster's thread near the top of the thread listing. We allow two bumps per thread.

Trolling (Obnoxious behavior)?
The post is designed to annoy other users, inflate the post count of the author, describe or recommend an illegal or recklessly dangerous activity, or give advice that, if followed, would cause obvious harm.

Trolling (Provocation)?
The post contains content which is designed to elicit an emotional response from other users.

Trolling (Widespread)?
Posting obnoxiously in multiple forums or threads with the intention of distracting the userbase and annoying moderators

Select one and open your own thread.

[Malc C]

Trolling (Provocation)?
The post contains content which is designed to elicit an emotional response from other users.



Then 90% of the people who post here could be accused of trolling as most posts can elicit an emotional response. some make me happy to try and help, some make me laugh, others :censored: me off, and some might make me want to cry !! - these are all emotions, maybe the moderators should be more explicit in defining the emotional response ?? - just an observation ;)

[rutat]

Yes, you reported me. You cut me deep Kurfgang. Really deep. (And yes, I know you will report this post, too).

You must have missed the emoticon Malc put there. It was obviously humor. And he is correct - it is technically illegal to post images without the express consent of the copyright holder. The link you posted n this thread is witin the law, but on another thread where you posted actual images without expressed permission IS NOT. Unless of course you do have the permission of the holder (which you should state BTW) or are the holder of said copyright.

This quid pro quo on reporting others is the silly part. I'm not playing.

[Malc C]

Yes, you reported me. You cut me deep Kurfgang. Really deep. (And yes, I know you will report this post, too).

This quid pro quo on reporting others is the silly part. I'm not playing.

You're not alone Tom, three of my posts were reported at the same time... seems like this board has a new self appointed moderator who likes quoting the site rules verbatum !

[Malc C]

Make that four posts ! - strange thing is this was reported for "personal attack" but I've read through MY post and can't see anyone actually named in *MY* post. If I've not actually named anyone how can it be deemed a personal attack ??

[peefiddyonefan]

Everytime I post anything I get issued a warning from Kurt also. Looks like hes getting ready to change identities LINK (http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=449870) or hopefully he really is leaving never to return. I hope he does the same thing over at RCUniverse.

To OP: try the interlink extra cable and report back.

[KurtHübener]

EDITED - nothing of relevance.

[jbourke]

I've split this thread from the original discussion.

If this sort of activity continues I'm not going to have any choice but to issue temporary bans to the posters who are baiting each other, reporting each other, and otherwise making this forum unusable for its intended purpose.

Please don't make me do that. If you see something that bothers you then use the "Report This Post to a Moderator" link or send private correspondence to the poster.

Jim