View Full Version : What do you think
Paul Wilson
Sep 18, 2003, 09:11 PM
Just wondered where we stand with this, definitely a warbird but electric and a model of a jet. Is this OT.
Good Luck
Paul
Paul Wilson
Sep 18, 2003, 09:13 PM
And another
my 17 pound 80 inch me262
BillH
Sep 18, 2003, 09:20 PM
Warbirds, I view as anything WW2, well, Vietnam too, if you include the sandys! I have no problem with it.
fw190
Sep 19, 2003, 06:15 PM
That looks too good, you best not post it here...LOL. It make my airplanes look terrible.
Electric, why not. I am planning for 88" electric P38. I think it is a warbird too.
Vic
tburley
Sep 19, 2003, 07:47 PM
looks Good to me Paul!
sent it too and I'll fly it for you:D
Todd
leccyflyer
Sep 20, 2003, 02:54 PM
Nice job Paul, very nice indeed.
If she's electric then strictly speaking she belongs in the Scale Modelling forum under the Ezone Forums tab. This forum is under the Fuel tab.
it would also be right at home in the electric Jets forum, where leccy Me-262s have been discussed at length.
You would probably get more views and discussion in either of those two forums.
Brian
therotund1
Sep 21, 2003, 09:24 PM
I think it's F A N T A S T I C ! I don't care if it's E-powered or not! Leave it on this forum. Beautiful job.
Dave,
ME262 envy
Ulf Rieder
Sep 22, 2003, 11:01 AM
I will be building this beautiful bird this coming fall/winter. Currently trying to buy everthing for it The ME-262 is my very favorite warbird. A dream for me will come true. I opted to go also electric de to the reliabiltiy on the motor as well as costs. 2 turbines are out of my range. :(
How does yours fly Paul ? I wrote you a PM about this bird a couple of days ago. Did you get it ?
Ulf
Paul Wilson
Sep 22, 2003, 11:58 PM
Sorry Ulf,
I have not flown this yet, I am not sure if or when. I have had some interest in it so I may let it go. I need to be in the 2k area.
That would leave just receiver and battery.Has 2 Aveox 1412/2y with midi and 36 rc2400 per plus all JR servos and CJ retracts.
Thinking about upgrading to lipo to get the safety margin I would like but I am a prop guy at heart and have too many projects on line.
Back to the topic, I posted this as it is in my opinion quite on topic for a warbird forum but I know that many people , especially on these forums try to seperate epower from carbon fuelers. They also seperate jet from prop. All these are quite understandable but I was hoping for some input from the users as to what they think. Personally I think that the common link for a warbird forum is not just the flying of heavy metal but the love and respect for the history of the machines involved. I have preferred areas of expertise but am able like many to offer help on all areas of historic reference concerning warbirds and would be happy to have any and all rcgroups users posting on this forum regarding this topic no matter what type of warbird they needed help on. That would include all methods of propulsion, model and fullscale. We could however limit our topics regarding propulsion and construction advice to prop powered fuel planes. this would give a centralised place for all RCGroups users to find and request historical data regarding military aircraft from all eras and types. I do not know if this would be too complicated but as this is a new forum I would like users input for the site owners to see
Good Luck
Paul
Paul
Heavy Date
Sep 23, 2003, 08:00 AM
Paul,
I am with you. Matters not what the power plant is. A warbird is a warbird.
Hans
therotund1
Sep 23, 2003, 08:19 AM
Originally posted by Paul Wilson
Personally I think that the common link for a warbird forum is not just the flying of heavy metal but the love and respect for the history of the machines involved.
That would include all methods of propulsion, model and fullscale.
this would give a centralised place for all RCGroups users to find and request historical data regarding military aircraft from all eras and types.
The first 2 lines are 100% spot on! EP and IC are means to and end. We choose our propulsion to suit our individual needs and skills. This does NOT alter the fact that a warbird is a warbird soooo, I feel that all warbirds should be welcome.
That last line up there, is that a typo? RC who?? :D
(Edit by moderator Paul "oops")
Just funnin'!
I'm glad you're here Paul. Thanks
Dave,
RCU refugee:D :D
Ulf Rieder
Sep 23, 2003, 09:19 AM
Well, I totally agree with you also Paul, and don't see why this bird shouldn't belong in the Warbird forum. After all it is a warbird, and this is the only warbird forum we have.
Ulf
Jeffery
Sep 23, 2003, 09:39 AM
Ulf, speaking of Warbirds...when do we get to see some Stuka photos??
And Paul, that is an extremely fine ME-262. The power plants don't matter to me, the bottom line is it is a very nicely executed model airplane!!
Ulf Rieder
Sep 23, 2003, 09:43 AM
Originally posted by Jeffery
Ulf, speaking of Warbirds...when do we get to see some Stuka photos??
Soon my friend soon ;) . Will take some next weekend. Beautiful Ziroli Stuka. I love it. :D
Ulf
roger75
Dec 07, 2004, 11:15 AM
wow! great looking warbird and an important historic one at that, how does it fly?
vBulletin® Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.