Nominating Committee Minutes

[J_R]

deleted

[Don Sims]

J_R,
Welcome to the site. If you need help with a link, let me know via PM.

If . . were the minutes, it was a very short meeting. ;)
Don

[lost_rc_guy]

Originally posted by J_R
Sorry, I can not get the image to load and I can not duplicate the exact minutes in the form they were recieved in, so I will not post them. Mr. Cain and Mr. Branaum are now in posession of the document and the amendment to it.

JR
Any chance of those showing up?

Roger

[J_R]

deleted

[Hossfly]

>>>>>>>>
"If . . were the minutes, it was a very short meeting.
Don"
<<<<<<<<<

.. would have been as adequate as the published minutes. They spent some 10 days doing, undoing, redoing and doing again what usually takes about 3 hours.

BTDT myself.

Horrace Cain
cani-date critter.

[J_R]

deleted

[J_R]

deleted

[Hossfly]

Originally posted by J_R
To be technically accurate, the NC meeting took 59 minutes.

JR

Have it any way you wish.

First report dated 7/12

Second report, "Addendum" dated 7/24.

To me that is adequate evidence that the meeting was NOT COMPLETE when the first round finished.

That is the reason that I have volunteered for 3 years as a DVP if the voters so wish.

I don't need a *Lackey* running around being a fixer-upper spokesman.

The membership will hear it all loud and clear directly from me.

That scares the EC half to death. A few of those there well know what I do, and how I will say, which ain't no hovering in the corner wimping out, "What he says."

Actually I am taking this election with a much lighter attitude than the EVP election last year. If elected, I will do 3 years and perform to the utmost of my ability to make some changes. If not, then so be it.

Horrace Cain
AMA 539

[J_R]

deleted

[lost_rc_guy]

yes, indeed, Mr. Cain.
Inquiring Dist VIII minds would like to know...

[Hal Ray]

You guys pressured your way onto this site just to act like spoiled kids? I'm glad I don't have to vote for any of you.

Hal Ray Harrington AMA 452422

[Hossfly]

Originally posted by J_R
Mr. Cain

Would you care to expalin exactly what that statement means, who it is aimed at, and why?

JR

"expalin" What does expalin mean?

If you mean "explain", like "Semper Fi" to a Marine: If you know, no explanation needed, and if you don't know, then all the explanation in the world can't help you.

Ask on of your ec buddies. They always seem to satisfy you.

[J_R]

deleted

[Don Sims]

Gents please comply with the guidelines of this site and treat each other with respect.
Don

[J_R]

deleted

[easytiger]

I'd say ONE AMA venom forum, over at RCUseless, is plenty. Save this drive space for something better, please.

And watch out for Horrace...he quit/was fired from the EC once already, many years ago, and he has had a grudge ever since. Beware.

[J_R]

deleted

[Tres Wright]

Gentlemen, first allow us to welcome you to R/C Groups :)

Now, please note that we have posting policies that must be adhered to, you can review them here:

http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=50714

Please note that personal attacks are prohibited as outlined under rule number 2:

"2. We strive to be a place for courteous discussion. Users shall treat each other with respect at all times. There shall be no name-calling. Users shall not provoke one another. Please pause for a moment before sending your post and consider how you would view it if you were reading it as addressed towards you personally. "

Currently because this forum is quite new, moderators have not yet been assigned to it. But once they (we) are, personal attacks will be edited out of any posted messages and warnings sent to the users. So please try to be civil towards one another. We should not have to resort to name-calling to get our points across.

We have plenty of drive space and the forum is here to stay, at least for now. So please feel free to utilize it for AMA related discussions.

Thank you!

[easytiger]

Originally posted by J_R
I agree. If I were the owner of this site, I would re-evaluate the decision to establish this forum. I don't think he has any idea of what he has let himself in for.

JR

With all due respect to the owners of this site, I really agree.
Based upon past history, there won't BE any "constructive dialogue", just nasty polemics. If you notice, it's just the same participants as in the RCU forum, there is really no need to duplicate it here.
It's just a matter of time before the mud gets slung, and somebody starts calling somebody a "damn liberal" or something.
Like JR, I think the owners just did not know the past history and what they were getting into. Best o' luck anyway.

[Mark Wood]

Originally posted by easytiger
It's just a matter of time before the mud gets slung, and somebody starts calling somebody a "damn liberal" or something.
Like that's new around here? We have dealt with mud slinging and political baiting in Off Topic Discussion for years and the mods will know how to deal with it in this forum. ;) :)

mw

[easytiger]

Well, now THAT's a typical republocrat response. This used to be a nice country before people like you and me showed up.