PDA

View Full Version : TM floats and tips


Brooks
Sep 07, 2003, 05:19 PM
I made floats for my GWS Tiger Moth. I live at 4600 feet in Bozeman, Montana. This forum has been extremely helpful to me. Thanks for all the great suggestions.

Motor/cup cowl:
The original motor did not have enough power to lift the TM from the water at this altitude (4600 feet, density altitude up to 7500 feet). I substituted a GWS dual motor unit, IPS-D RXC (A gearing, 5.9:1), with an APC 10x7 inch Slow Flyer prop. Note that the dual motor is mounted on the original TM motor mount stick, making the prop off-center. By positioning the prop to the port side, I get a useful right thrust effect. I used a servo mount screw to secure the motor to the stick. Because the drive shaft is now off-center, the original cowl would no longer fit. I substituted a plastic cup: “Solo TP10, 10 oz." I cut off the bottom and the rim of the cup. It fit so well, I wonder if the model designer used one :-).

Battery:
1020mah 2S1P Li-poly from Radical RC. I secure the battery with Velcro to the passenger cockpit. The ESC wire leads out the gap between the fuselage and the lower wing. Changing batteries is very easy, but watch you don't bump the throttle stick; I put a rubberband on the transmitter that holds the throttle closed when I am fooling with the battery/ESC wires.
http://radicalrc.secure-mall.com/shop/index.php?shop=1&cart=63354&cat=1&

Float design: I designed mine using the suggestions in Cunningham's 1997 RCM article. His 1993 article is available online. The only changes from '93 to '97 that I see are: 1) he increased the angle of the bottom of the aft portion of the float
from 3 to 5 degrees 2) he uses a flat surface instead of a curved one on the bottom of the nose of the floats.

To save weight, my floats are not as deep as his. I used 1 inch pink foam insulation. For a strongback, I inlet a 1/4 inch square strip of hardwood into the top of the float. The inlet was just picked out with a #11 blade. 5min epoxy secures the strongback.

I have not put Cunningham's suggested vertical supports in the strongback. So far, the floats have survived numerous pond and land crashes. In fact, I recommend floats as training skids for anyone landing in tall grass. When not at the pond, I fly over an uncut hayfield, so all my landings are crash-like. The floats cushion my arrivals, and also protect the prop ( I do use a prop saver). Remove the spreader dowels to allow the wire struts to spread to absorb shock when flying over land.
RCM Sept 1997 pg.144 Chuck Cunningham article
RCM April 1993 similar Cunningham article online
http://flyinglindy.homestead.com/skisandfloats.html

Float dimensions: 40cm long, 4.5cm wide, 2.6cm deep. Step is 24cm from the nose. Step depth 8mm. Slope at nose 4cm long. Total spread of floats 22.6cm outside to outside edge.
Mine came out 40cm long, but adding another 2.5cm to the stern would make a better float. Floats are covered, bottom and sides, with clear packing tape. 3M77 spray-on adhesive may be used before taping if *Lightly* applied. Allow the toluene in the glue to evaporate before applying the tape, or you risk melting holes in your foam. I airbrushed water-based acrylic enamel (mixed 50:50 with water) on the floats. I did not scuff the tape with steel wool before painting, and got poor adhesion.

Strut wires and spreader dowels:
Wire diameter 0.055 inch for struts and 0.039 inch for the brace. Distance from float top to wing leading edge about 10cm. Spreaders are 1/8 inch dowels held to the floats with duct tape.

Float mounting:
I use rubberbands hooked to the wing hold dowels. I added 1/32 inch ply reinforcement tabs to the fuselage to support the dowels. To make a positive angle of attack between the bottom wing and the top of the floats, I duct-taped a small piece of pink foam to the fuselage where the forward float strut wire rests. This gives me a 5 mm greater distance from float top to wing at the leading edge than from float top to wing at trailing edge. You could, of course, simply make your forward wire mount longer to achieve the same effect. I used a foam spacer figuring it would make it easier to modify the angle than rebending the wire struts.

The nose of the floats is 20cm forward from the lower wing's L.E. at the fuselage. This gives approximately 5.5cm of float extension forward of the prop. My original design did not allow enough forward extension, and the nose would bury when I applied power. To correct, I merely glued pink foam to the float aft of the step, and re-positioned the strut mounting blocks (pieces of 1/4 hardwood left over from the strongback). Both the correction foam and the mounting blocks are attached with foam-safe CA. Sanding the new foam to match the existing slope of the bottom resulted in a total float depth of slightly more than the 1 inch foam I started with.

Flying experience:
When landing, have patience: set up your descent with power and elevator, then let the plane do the work; don't rush it by fiddling with the stick, or you risk flaring too high and dunking. Been there, swum that.. It is much easier for me to
judge my flare when the plane is passing right to left in front of me than when it is traveling away from me. Traveling away during landing makes it much easier to discern if wings are level, but much harder to detect distance from the water.

The dual motor makes the plane nose heavy. You can add enough lead to the tail to balance to the same specs as with the original motor: but the floats themselves will cause a pitch-up moment when you take off (they act like wings with a center of lift forward of your regular wings). So, a little nose heavy is not a bad thing in this circumstance.

The increase in weight (dual motor and some counter-balancing lead) leads to a faster glide, changing the timing you are used to. Practice some landings over a hayfield before you go to the water...unless you like swimming for your plane. Well I needed a bath anyway.... In my water crashes, the plane floats nose down, but very high out of the water. The electronics (encased in Trojans, non-lubricated, the end tied with rubber band) don't even get soaked, just splashed by whatever gets past the wing/fuselage gap. I used tape to seal the old battery slot into the fuselage.

When retrieving your plane, which I do by swimming, hold it vertical, just like it was floating, and you may keep water out of the electronics compartment. Once back on land, I gently tip the plane to it's side to release any sloshing water from the fuselage. So far, I've been able to relaunch without moisture problems.

The Tiger Moth on floats looks beautiful. At sunset, with the red light glinting on the wings, you are living Out of Africa. I'd encourage anyone with access to water to try floats.

Brooks

Brooks
Sep 07, 2003, 05:27 PM
Here is the plastic cup cowl:

Brooks
Sep 07, 2003, 05:31 PM
Wire brace is silver soldered to struts. Simple masking tape used for keepers on strut/float attachment. Duct tape (white) to hold spreader dowels.

Brooks
Sep 07, 2003, 05:33 PM
pink foam spacer for setting wing/float angle of attack

dulcelife
Sep 07, 2003, 07:16 PM
Great project,

Hurry up and post more pictures. LOL

Luis~

Brooks
Sep 09, 2003, 11:33 PM
I went to the pond today and did not do so well. The TM with the dual engine did not develop enough power to get off the water. Since it worked ok for takeoffs last time, I am not sure what changed. I took the plane home afterwards, and flew in our field to dry out the motor. I noticed some "bad bearing" sounds as it flew past. So perhaps the motor shaft or gear box bearings rusted. I had run the motor to warm/hot condition after the previous outing, thinking that would dry things out. But I did not oil the bearings (some post I read said you had to be careful to not get oil on the comutator). In the future I will oil the gearbox bearings after a session at the pond.
-------------------
A few days later.....
Mystery partly solved: One of the dual motors was not running. I took both motors appart, and discovered one had worn out brushes, and the other was still brand new looking. There was no sign of rust damage in either motor, so water entry is perhaps not the problem I feared. Both ran initially, for I noticed definite climb improvement with the first flight. And, Both motors ran on the bench, but not in the air. I am guessing a bad wire in the harness somewhere, causing intermittent operation of one motor.

Brooks
Sep 21, 2003, 01:50 AM
I'm going to make longer floats, say 18.5 inches or 19 inches. The 16 inch ones don't hold the tail up as high as I would like. 18.5 inches would also be closer to scale length. The floats (or the wood spreaderbars) seem to absorb water: the plane floats ok initially, but after a 1/2 hour on the water, sinks more at the stern.

My friend John (a real floatplane pilot) can take off and land the 16 inchers fine, as long as there is a breeze to give some extra airspeed and break up the glassy surface of the pond. I'm hoping the additional length will assist us both in glassy water takeoffs.

Jim C
Sep 22, 2003, 12:39 PM
Brooks:

Thanks for starting the TM on floats thread. I'm getting ready to replace my son's TM after more than its share of training repairs. I've bought him a new Moth and I may just have to convert the old one for pond duty! :D

I have a few questions.

AA) How do you secure your electronics inside the airframe once they are wrapped in the Trojans?

BB) What is the all up weight of your TM with floats?

CC) Are you striving to keep the same COG as the land based TM or are you finding the need to shift it due to drag of the floats or something?

DD) You mentioned "18.5 inches would also be closer to scale length." Do you have photos of a full scale Moth on floats? Could you post them, please?

EE) How does the moth do regarding steering control on the water? Does it need a water rudder?

Thanks, Jim C.

Brooks
Sep 22, 2003, 01:51 PM
Hi Jim C,

AA) I just used masking tape over the Trojan to keep the RX from flopping around too much. Nothing holding the ESC, as I did not want to insulate it more than it's Trojan already does. The wires and rubber seem to hold it in place ok.

BB) I don't know. It's probably heavier than stock since I taped L.E and T.E. of both wings with filament tape. Also, I used duct tape to secure struts, and that adds weight (compared to a dot of epoxy or Probond).

CC) I'm no expert on CG. I have not experimented, so Reills might be a better source of info. When I added the extra fin, it moved the CG aft. This is bad, according to another flyer who emailed me. The fin is a great help in keeping the plane from veering on takeoff.

DD) My measurements on a photo show floats at 75% of prop-stabilizer hinge length. This would make floats 17.1" for the TM model. RC guys say 75 to 80% works; the longer figure would yield 18.25". The photo showed 7% of float forward of the prop. I use 10% for more dive-resistance.

EE) I have no water rudder, and my taxiing is poor if there is a wind. The extra fin really killed the ability to taxi cross-wind. Since my pond is only 5 acres, I can always walk to the plane, and I have not made a water rudder.

Brooks
Sep 22, 2003, 01:53 PM
The fin is about 13x7 cm, and made of plastic scavenged from a shrink-wrapped tool package. It's glued to a piece of pink foam, and then the unit is duct taped to the TM fuselage. If you hand launch with this fin, be sure to get your hand down after release, otherwise you'll hit the fin and tear it loose.

Brooks
Sep 22, 2003, 01:59 PM
This site has some Moths on floats. You'll have to drill down: photographs/floatplanes/Pick a Moth/click on moth's name.

http://www.bushplane.com/

Here's a photo from M.A.N. October 1991, pg 61.

Brooks
Sep 22, 2003, 02:04 PM
This book shows Hornet Moth with same dimensions as Tiger Moth. My attached picture (pg.149) is somewhat distorted because I could not get the book to lie flat. Taken from: "Biplanes, Triplanes, and Seaplanes." by Michael Sharpe. 2000. published by Friedman/Fairfax. (available from Motorbooks.com)

Brooks
Sep 22, 2003, 03:45 PM
My floatplane pilot friend John says if I would just paddle faster, he could fly the TM off the aircraft carrier. I am wondering how fast I'd need to go to take off myself.

Jim C
Sep 22, 2003, 08:21 PM
LOL! Sounds like you guys are having great fun with the Moth on floats. I'll have to give it a try. Thanks for the answers. I will be doing this but I suspect it won't make it to the top of the build list until October or so!

Cool picture of the Hornet Moth! I hadn't seen one of those before! Interesting indeed.

Jim C.


BTW - You might be interested in this thread I posted about making a new cowling by heat shrinking a plastic cup...

http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=112811

Jim C
Sep 23, 2003, 10:44 PM
I found this drawing in Flying Scale Models.

Tiger Moth on Edo Floats, The Seaplane Club, Lee-on-Solent

By the way... what are Edo floats?

Brooks
Sep 24, 2003, 12:30 AM
Great drawing of TM on floats, Jim; I like it especially because it shows a lot of float in front of the prop, which is what I had to do when mounting mine, for the 2nd time.

My new floats, based on jimsp's DIY floats thread in this forum, are completed, except for painting. If they work as well as they look, I'll be really happy. My first set were simple flat bottomed floats, these look a lot neater.

Edo is a manufacturer of floats, and has been making them for a long time. The drawing of the Hornet Moth is on Fairchild floats, another manufacturer (not as well known to me as Edo).

http://www.kenmoreair.com/parts/EDOfloats/EDOfloats.html

Brooks

MISTERSCOTT
Sep 24, 2003, 04:55 AM
Hi,
Flew my TM last Sat. with 17 inch floats from www.foamfloats.com for first time at a float fly-in.
Also have their 19 inch on my Beaver, the 17s were on it for 9 months(a little too small), but just bought the 19s for the Beaver.
Both ROW great, tried hand made ones last year with no success.
They are worth the $18.00
Fuel guys sure get a kick seeing these great GWS planes fly.
John

Brooks
Sep 24, 2003, 09:26 PM
The new floats work great. Takeoffs on glassy water are easily accomplished, Yay! Jimsp's DIY float design is a real winner, Thanks Jimsp!

Dimensions of this 2nd set of floats:
Length 19"/48cm
Bow to step 10.25/26
Width at top 1.75/4.4
Width at widest part of pentagon 2.25/5.8
Step depth 3/8" /1cm

Power setup: IPSdual S1 gearing, 1020mah LiPo 2S1P, APC 10x7 prop.

My modifications to jimsp's design:
a) I ran a strip of filament tape along the top and bottom of the float before I added the packing tape. I used 1.5" pink foam, and the tail of the float was pretty thin and flexible before I added the filament tape.
b) I made my mounts adjustable by drilling more holes in the plywood tab. Turns out they work fine using the same holes as my first set, but it was an easy mod to do before glueing the mount onto the float.

Construction notes:
a) I got some packing tape wrinkles at the junction of the upsweep between the nose and the long flat (V actually) portion of the floats. I was going to cut relief slits in the tape after it was on the float (as I did sucessfully with flat-bottomed set#1) but forgot that with the V shape, there would be a different set of relief cuts needed. Of course by the time I realized that, the tape was already stuck down, hoho.
b) My first attempt to airbrush the floats failed. I had diluted the water-based acrylic enamel paint with water (like last time) but it just beaded up. I had steelwooled and alcohol-cleaned the floats before painting. I let the paint spots dry, then remixed a batch of paint with auto windshield washer fluid as the thinner. This worked like a charm, Thank you Paul! (of www.airfieldmodels.com )
c) A modeler emailed me suggesting that my cg/step relationship was a problem. He was right...unfortunately I forgot to write down his name, so.. Thanks, Nameless One!
d) I lost about 1/8 inch in vertical dimensions after sanding the pink foam, you might want to plan for this when you cut yours. Or just cut straighter than me *grin*.

Brooks
Oct 01, 2003, 03:06 PM
After experimenting with takeoff techinque this morning, I found this useful information from the FAA: AC 61-21A, chapter 15

http://www.seaplanes.org/library/govtpubs.htm

Under the taxiing section, the publication described just what I had to do to get up on the step: 1)start takeoff run with full back stick 2) as plane accelerates, the nose of floats will get higher and higher 3) when nose gets to highest point, relax stick 4)plane will fall forward onto the step.

I changed motors from the ipsdual S1 to the PJS300. The ipsdual seems to generate more thrust than the PJS300; getting on the step was simple...throttle up and go. The outrunner requires more technique, making it similar to real seaplane operation.

pondflyer
Oct 01, 2003, 11:58 PM
After having been a passenger in a Cessna Float plane a few years ago in FIGI, I can verify that the takeoff technique described above is valid. FULL back stick, max power, ease the stick forward when the plane won't go any faster and ride the step to takeoff speed.

Quite a ride and fun to duplicate with a RC float plane.

Dick

PS It wasn't the case the day my wife and I flew, but I was told that the pilot used the same technique to get the plane off in the face of an oncoming typhoon and the attendant rough seas. He made three attempts to land before he finally finally made it, grabbed two passengers and took off. The rest of the folks on the island rode out the 200 mph monster in not much more than grass huts.

Brooks
Oct 03, 2003, 06:50 PM
I think the IPSdual S1 with APC 10x7 provides enough power for TM float ops. Unfortunately, the motor seems to lose power after a dunking. While dry, it runs great.
----------
I switched to a PJS300 with a Castle Creations Phoenix10 controller. I discussed the well-known, stutter-on-startup problem with Shawn of Castle; his suggestion to program for the softest governor setting (7-1) helped. With a slow throttle advance, until the motor smooths out (which you can hear if the plane is close), the controller works fine with the motor. Stutter is prop-dependent: a 7x4 works with no stutter at all, but larger props require me to use the slow throttle advance. Once the motor smooths out, I can quickly open the throttle to full power.

I am having overheating problems with the PJS300. When the motor overheats, it jams; the stator rubs on the bell, locking up the motor. An early warning sign is a loss of power; presumeably this occurs when the stator first starts rubbing the bell. Sometimes I have 15 seconds warning, but sometimes it happens so fast I can't get the throttle closed in time to avoid lockup.

Overheating is prop-dependent and air-temperature- dependent. If it is cold out, I can use an APC 9x3.8 (the max-thrust prop listed on the PJS website), but if it is warmish (74degF in the shade), that prop overheats the motor after a minute or two. The "overheated" motor does not feel hot, only slightly warm to the touch. Once it has cooled, the bell frees up and the motor runs again. An APC 8x6 works better, especially if I dunk the engine in the pond between flights. This is the prop recommended to me by Tjcooper, thanks Ted!

I am planning to try a PJS550E, perhaps the 300 is just not enough engine for my altitude (density alt today about 6500ft).

Brooks
Oct 05, 2003, 07:56 PM
I finally took the circlip off the pjs300 and pulled the bell; I wanted to see if I could figure out why it was not developing much power. I can see copper where several wires from the stator stuck out past the stator and rubbed on the bell. I suspect that they are shorting out. This would change the inductance of that segment, I think. It's a wonder the Phoenix 10 could run it at all (a Jeti 18-3p would not). Now I have to see about warrantee repair/replacement, sigh.

I replaced the PJS300 with a PJS550E, and the new motor runs great. The power it develops with an APC 9x7.5 (Lipo 2s1p) is quite impressive. I can take off from glassy water at partial throttle...discovered that while taxiing, hoho. The plane flies faster, with the heavier engine, of course. I needed more weight up front, anyway, so that worked out ok. The motor is mounted with foam tape and tie-wraps, per Basketcase and Tjcooper. Be sure to wrap the tape all the way around the aluminum shaft; I originally used just a short piece of tape between motor and the engine mount stick and that was not sufficient.

Brooks
Oct 18, 2003, 07:17 PM
The PJS550E continues to run very well. With 2s2p lipo's I can take off at about 5/8 throttle in a realistic manner...or give it full throttle and leap up like a jumping trout. With a 3s1p 1200mah Etech (from NipponDave's Aircraft World site), it flys forever (or at least longer than I want to). The 12 volt setup gives both power and duration.

My beginner friend has crashed the TM twice on gravel. Water crashes have never broken anything, but gravel.....First time the float broke at the step and the fuselage broke in the usual TM place. Titebond polyurethane glue fixed both breaks with no problem. I diluted the glue with water, per a thread somewhere, and it worked fine. Second crash, the same float broke, but the glue repair held, showing that water dilution does not diminuish strength. The glue for this repair is drying now :-)

The first crash broke the motor stick. I now have the motor mounted with the "2 firewalls plus nylon screws and springs" method shown in other threads. This works well, and perhaps the springs absorbed some of the shock in the 2nd crash.
http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=129644&highlight=tigger+moth+mason

For windy days, the heavier 2s2p battery works better than a 2s1p; the extra weight makes the plane penetrate during a glide upwind.

Brooks
Nov 04, 2003, 08:20 PM
I put up a small video of my Moth flying a circuit on floats. The motor is the PJS300, before it went kaput :-)


http://www.brooks.rchomepage.com/

LedKitty
Nov 28, 2003, 01:43 AM
Hi guys!

Ok, I got myself a nice big slab of 2" foam, 4' X 2', and I'm already to build floats for my TM, a little forerunner project if you will before I turn my GWS Zero into a GWS Rufe.

Now here's the thing. I'm surfing around looking for some neat FMS models to try out, and I stumble across this awesome little single float TM with outriggers!

Has this ever been done on a Tiger Moth? A single sport float that is? The more I look at it, the more I'm being drawn in the single float direction... :rolleyes:

What do you guys think?


LedKitty

Brooks
Nov 28, 2003, 06:34 AM
Hi LedKitty,

Single float looks cool. Have you seen Alaskaflyer's video on his Rufe? His plane flies really well, and I'd imagine the TM would do well also. I am a believer in "more power" for float ops, so you might want to consider a bigger than stock engine for your TM.

Brooks

LedKitty
Nov 28, 2003, 10:28 AM
Hee hee...

That's ok, I've got a GWS 350CC on a 9070 up front! More than enough power to spare! Even with all the paint, wing reinforcement, epoxy (it's my first Moth!) and new foam wheels she still climbs like an elevator! :D

I'm particularly keen on the single float idea due to the decrease in drag and weight involved, but alas, mounting might be a little tricky on my existing Moth, especially as I want to be able to switch back and forth between wheels and floats... The Rufe is going to be a piece of cake by comparison!

Ah well, it'll probably wind up being two floats for my current birdy! Perhaps my next one? Anyhoo, I'll post some pics when I get the floats done!

And I'll probably start my own thread for the Rufe float ;) I've got some pretty whacky ideas for that. Any ideas of how I should make the outrigger floats?

LK

john forstall
Nov 28, 2003, 03:00 PM
LedKitty,
Where did you findthe TM on single? Can the guy be contacted for more info? This is a great looking idea.
John F.

LedKitty
Nov 28, 2003, 03:15 PM
Howdy John!

I found it right here:

http://kimagure-hikoki.hp.infoseek.co.jp/FMSMODEL/Hanger_index.html

There's a good number of great FMS models there! I'm not entirely certain that particular moth is based on an actual RC or was simply modeled for the sim, but it's worth checking out I think!

In the simulator she flies beautifully! Much lighter and daintier than the twin float model! :D

Damn.. hee hee.. choosing between these two configurations is getting tougher and tougher!

How wide would you make the single float? I'm guessing wider than twin floats, so say 3 inches? Should the outriggers be foam as well? Or would hollow plastic be a better idea?

I've been going quite nuts lately on a fanatical flying boat kick, looking back at some of the great waterplanes of the 20s and 30s! I'm looking at putting floats on everything in sight! hee hee...:D

Kitty

MikeL72
Nov 28, 2003, 04:54 PM
Hello Ledkitty

If you are into designing your single float attachment and want some guidance, Bruce Stenulson has a web site RC Flight (sorry I don't have the link to give you) with and excellent writing on the subject. If your an AMA member -- archives are available to you through their web site and Ed Westwood has published some pretty solid and detailed info in the 1994 time frame -- again sorry for not having more exact pointing but the search on the authors should get you there.

Waterplanes are much fun -- and very addictive.

Mike

Brooks
Nov 28, 2003, 07:08 PM
I put the Ed Westwood article, and one by Chuck Cunningham, on my webpage.

http://www.brooks.rchomepage.com/

LedKitty
Nov 29, 2003, 05:15 AM
That's awesome Brooks! Thanks! :D

Looks like I've got some reading to do this weekend!


Kitty

john forstall
Nov 29, 2003, 09:13 AM
Thanks Brooks,
Wonderful stuff. Lots of reading for a cold day.

Mchone, Jake
Dec 20, 2003, 11:32 AM
Where did you guys get the pix and specks of the real moth?

cloudhopper
Dec 23, 2003, 06:05 PM
Brooks
You'll have to bring the moth up for our float fly-in this summer if time allows.After attending last year it got me thinking about putting floats on my moth;)Right now I've got her on skis for snow patrol.

steve
http://www.helenaflyingtigers.org

Chris Dearden
Dec 25, 2003, 12:00 AM
g'day cloudhopper, it doesnt look like that out my window at the moment ;-) but geat conditions for floats. having just read this thread i am now into the mark 3 floats for the pico stick and the tm. i now realise that i just didnt make them long enough at the front. dont ask me how i found out!

chris