sailplaneguy
Aug 05, 2003, 02:23 AM
I notice that most model gliders use a flat stabilizer, while
most real airplanes use an inverted airfoil (curved side on the bottom).
In real airplanes this is done to provide dynamic pitch stability.
Since the cg is slightly forward of the center of lift, when the
airspeed increases because the nose is lowered, the stab produces more
downward lift thus raising the nose. This is why too forward a cg can be
dangerous on landing because the elevator may not be able to offset
the forward cg, and too aft a cg the airplane becomes unstable and
hard to control, although it flies more efficiently.
Why don't we see many models with an airfoil shape on the horizontal
tail? Is it because we depend on the decalage (I think
that's the right term - the angle between the stab. and the
wing chords?) to compensate for the cg - cl difference? Does
this cause greater upset and drag due to extra trimming?
most real airplanes use an inverted airfoil (curved side on the bottom).
In real airplanes this is done to provide dynamic pitch stability.
Since the cg is slightly forward of the center of lift, when the
airspeed increases because the nose is lowered, the stab produces more
downward lift thus raising the nose. This is why too forward a cg can be
dangerous on landing because the elevator may not be able to offset
the forward cg, and too aft a cg the airplane becomes unstable and
hard to control, although it flies more efficiently.
Why don't we see many models with an airfoil shape on the horizontal
tail? Is it because we depend on the decalage (I think
that's the right term - the angle between the stab. and the
wing chords?) to compensate for the cg - cl difference? Does
this cause greater upset and drag due to extra trimming?